clwanse
Bad apples
Liberal 2.0ers are as big or bigger hypocrites than non Liberal 2.0ers
*/** I would love to talk about how terrible Republicans are, but Democrats won't give me even a moment to do so. */**
In terms of views, the MAGA trolls & company , extreme right wing, and even non Liberal 2.0ers are so unmoored from the reality of other views that they take on the paranoid style. I am sure most of them are capable of being reasonable .* Liberal 2.0ers are grifting in that direction too and passed the point of no return
Republicans and non Liberal 2.0ers need to drop the us vs them populism and find reasons to unite with the other side instead of fight with them. Right Wing populists need to do the SHUT UP challenge
*/**Similarly the ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers take a page straight out of the revisionist /International Communism (anti Individualist and anti Liberal revisionist International Communism only) playbook and the vulgar authoritarian playbook which is to label anyone that doesn't think like them as the enemy . This is also us vs them type mentality */**
*/** Both types of us vs them thinking by both sides are disabling , everywhere you go you feel like people are judging you simply due to you believe in liberty/equality for everyone. */**
*/** The ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers claim to want to give a hearing to other views (and yes they have this in them), but then are shocked (science red) and offended to discover that there are other views (of course all people of all ideologies suck at debating and have resistance to hearing new views like here, here) */**
*/** Like this thread by Breadtube mentions, this SLS thread mentions, and also here basically. I know that ultra lefitsts and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers are more than capable of being respectful of others views and being cordial. We need to find solutions for this like here. Though to be far the left might not be so open to Liberalism 2.0 as a whole or even wary to it as this thread points out for good reason */**
*/**It's funny, ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers always claim to stick up for the 'marginalized' and 'oppressed' while claiming to be against bullying ,yet they engage in ostracism tactics (as mentioned here),especially on social media over people and views they find offensive or don't agree with. This article by Harvard Crimson is what I am getting at and has some good takes on this. Those Liberal 2.0ers as a whole needs to increase their altruism to reduce their ostracism (ostracism is evil and is a threat to our way of life) See here for more also */**
A lot of Liberal 2.0ers like the Twitter trolls who WRONGLY attacked and tried to cancel Chris Pratt over him not going to a Joe Biden fundraiser and for Pratt’s INNOCENT Instagram post about his wife or who WRONGLY attacked Scott Baio about his date with his wife, or the evil redditors in a local subreddit who WRONGLY insulted and bullied another redditor asking for friend advice all because he belonged to a left wing anti idpol subreddit, the braindead students at the University of New Hampshire who WRONGLY tried to prevent Dave Rubin’s speech a few years ago (including that idiot professor who inspired them) ,the pieces of sh*t who WRONGLY swatted Tim Pool and MTG are all cringe sick people and a mark on our country, world and society. They are pious, mean, bullying and live in an echo chamber. Social media brings out the worst in people.
Their parents were horrible parents for raising them to be such evil demonic trolls. Their grandparents were horrible parents to their parents.
This is because of proto Liberal 2.0 new age methods used to raise and teach children like those particular Liberal 2.0 trolls in the 1980s and 1990s and 2000s was senseless, stupid, and flat out wrong
Those particular Liberal 2.0 are literally the vocal MINORITY.The vast vast majority of Americans and Canadians are against their trolling and evil acts
*/**The thing is that at times, ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers FALSELY smear any Leftist/Liberal 2.0er/Democrat who disagrees with them as right wing since that way they can falsely say 'SEE only right wingers disagree with us'. */**
It's the oldest trick in the book and Right wingers do this too (like see here)
The non Liberal 2.0ers and especially Republicans do this purity sh*t a lot with rejecting right wingers who support Socialism-Communism, Anarchism, Paternalistic Conservativism, left wing feminisms, 4pt, etc, just see Conservapedia and Free Republican for this inaction)
*/** It is insane that ultra leftists Liberal 2.0ers falsely insist that anyone on their side who has opinions that diverge from their groupthink views must be a grifter, DINO, tankie alt right or far right. But this youtube video by The Kaverancle provides insight into this and the fingerprints from that perspective from that video on this by The Kavernacle can be found throughout this post. */**
The right wing and non liberal 2.0ers need to leave their safe spaces
*/**Ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers and some similar sub sects of Liberalism, through purity tests, create a highly objectionable system where all views are absolutely labeled as right wing, or liberal/progressive /left wing.
So if you for example show sympathy for the pro life movement they say ‘so and so sounds like a right wing Trump supporter’. */**
*/**They push these so called ‘grifters’ further and further right with their purity tests and witch hunts all because these so called ‘grifters’ had the audacity to agree with non liberal 2.0ers on a few hot button issues. Being open to discussion has nothing to do with which side you're aligned with. */**
*/** Ultra left and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers have to take a page out of the lefitst playbook and push for conditional left liberal unity (as mentioned here which is a base thread or maybe like here and mentioned here but between Liberal 2.0ers and leftists)
This way ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers can justify shunning, canceling , censoring, excluding people they don’t agree with since they put everyone in the ‘right wing’ camp that don’t agree with them, even on only a few issues that to them are ‘right wing’. See here and here/here for more */**
*/** They use this to shut down opposition since they can falsely say through these dumb purity tests ‘see only right wingers would have such views, walk like a duck talk like a duck must be a duck’ */**
*/** That condoning of such behavior by the Liberal 2.0ers as a whole makes them look guilty (like they are wrong not that I necessarily believe that) since if they were correct, they wouldn’t care if people on the other side questioned or opposed their views on hot button issues. The Liberal 2.0ers need to stop dying on these hills (see here for more) and debate better like mentioned here */**
It is the same thing with the Radical Right. Any Republican who dares says a negative word about 45 , MAGA or MAGA views is labeled a RINO, Socialist, or Assistant Democrat. Any Republican who doesn’t kiss Trump’s rings is Terruqueo targeted MAGA. It is a whole nother type of twisted cultism on the Right
It is insane that Radical Right, far right and alt right falsely insist that anyone on their side who has opinions that diverge from their hive mind views must be a Communist, Marxist , RINO, Assistant Democrat or CCPer
The Radical Right, far right and alt right smear them with these fake labels to delegitimize them since the Radical Right, far right and alt right are afraid of change and being seen as the stubborn, ultra hard line provocateurs they are
*/** If ultra leftist and other unreasonable Liberal 2.0ers keep smearing people on their side who disagree with them as grifters ,DINOs, tankies or far right, it’s a given that the Democrat Party and its members will be very negatively effected from from within, since no one wants to be part of an overall Liberal 2.0 (particularly neo lib eral echo chamber (see here, here ,here, here, here/here for more)
Stuff like that splits the Democrats and their Liberal 2.0-Left coalition */**
*/** Basically a Liberal 2.0 echo chamber where unreasonable Liberal 2.0ers like ultra leftists have to parrot every Liberal 2.0 talking point or be smeared as a grifter ,DINO, tankie or far right, by Ultra leftists who live in a bubble and are too chicken shit to defend their enlightened talking points. I can’t stand to see the Democrats sink to those depths */**
*/** Liberalism 2.0 causes some unreasonable sects like ultra leftists to come to not be able to deal with the fact that people/people on their side think differently. */**
*/** Liberal 2.0 as a whole and some non Liberal 2.0ers always try to change the meaning of what being Left Wing or Right wing is. They of course the Right Wing does this in their own unique but no less bad (Right wingers are small minded and phobic that is why, see here and see here for more) way but I digress */**
*/** Whenever a few but significant amount of Liberal 2.0ers and specific non Liberal 2.0ers can’t win a debate they throw around the tired and lame ‘racist’ smear (hint a significant minority of people they call ‘racists’ are not racists, they don’t even know the true meaning of the word). Words have power */**
*/** How can Liberal 2.0ers and some sects of non Liberal 2.0ers see everything each other sees yet have the exact opposite views of those things?
No matter how much truth and facts each side points out, they will call each other names, use dishonest tactics ,emotionally charged attacks while spewing misleading info like robots . One side has MSM and Big Tech and mainstream, the other side has their own spaces. They always have counters to everything. */**
*/** The ultra left and other non reasonable types of Liberals 2.0ers and some sects of non Liberal 2.0ers truly exist to torment us (to appease our torment fetishes) and they cannot even do it in a way that is fun and uplifting which would make it more bearable. At least we are genuine in our causes even if we are an unsavory bunch at times
To think the Liberal 2.0s have a monopoly on what is correct , right and moral is naive, ignorant and very wrong. This article ,provides good insights of our current political divide */**
*/** Putting everyone who doesn’t agree with Liberal 2.0 political views into the same cookie cutter category is naive and ignorant due to the complexity of politics . Putting everyone who doesn’t agree with MAGA approved political views into the same category is naive and ignorant due to the complexity of politics . */**
*/** Just because a Left Winger doesn’t agree with a Liberal 2.0 view/Democrat doesn’t mean they aren’t Left Wing or that they are Right wing. It’s like a Liberal calling salad ‘fascism’ or ‘communism’ because they don’t like salad. */**
*/** The ultra leftist and other unreasonable types liberal 2.0ers instead of debating them , smear them, trash them and that is wrong, problematic and against our values
I've always been bothered with how ultra leftist and other unreasonable types of Liberal 2.0ers gang up on non Liberal 2.0ers they don't agree with (like here, here and mentioned here, here, here, here and here basically like a dog pile) or companies and other entities they don't agree with on social media whenever those people say something offensive or does something that triggers them. Like a post liberal Corporataracy or
It feels a bit like bullying. This can change see here for how */**
Some of my fellow Americans say they have seen this with Elon Musk (but I tend to echo the answers to his/her question on Quora). I echo this Slate article on this but I also echo this whole reddit thread on it too (maybe including the screenshot too?)
Look at who is ganging up on him: NY Times, open society foundation, AOC (she should know better), Elizabeth Warren, Joy Reid, Robert Reich, TechCrunch, Howard Dean, Shaun King, George Takei , pretty much anyone who served in any capacity under Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama, etc
How would these Liberal 2.0ers enjoy having the tide turned on them? They wouldn't like it so much, just ask Debra Messing how it feels.
Sorry, Elon Musk (who is from South Africa) supporting a BIPOC Republican (Mayra Florez) absolutely is NOT a ‘white supremacy’, see this for more.
However, Elon Musk not allowing his workers to unionize shows Musk is a petty bourgeois ,greedy Capitalist classist, just like all major corporate-Big Tech leaders and companies (i.e Walmart, Google, Jeff Bezos and Amazon, etc)
Doesn't it seem 'weird' that its always the same Liberal 2.0 entities and people who protest against things they don't like? Same corporations, same celebrities, same news orgs, same political people, same organizations etc.
Comments
Post a Comment