rw tp corp bias fix

There is an obvious Capital Corporatist , Liberal 2.0 bias media bias (including anti Bernie media bias see here, here, here, here, here, here) in the media and that is a fact (see here for more)  Also ee this, this, this, this/this, this, this , this post, this post, this post, this post, here, here/here, here and here

The corporate media are predators (like see here)

 All media has a spin (see here, here). There is no such thing as objective media, no matter how hard they try. 

Just look at how blatantly bias fake news rags such as Forbes, Time, Huffpost, NPR (like here, here, here , here , here  and here).  See this post, here , here for more

If NPR only gets 4% of its funding from the government, it should be relatively easy to lower government funding to 0% with the rest of the funding from donations (unless the government rightfully nationalizes it, otherwise 0%)

Let me point out I may be off here. The MSM does go very right wing at times, from Tom Cotton’s op ed in the NYT in mid 2020, to the Washington Post having an anti progressive, pro rich bias (Amazon-Jeff Bezos major reason why), to MSNBC being neocon and more way of progressives and leftists due to Never Trumper commentators being too much of a good thing for them to many other various op eds from MSM that I have noticed that sound like they could have come from Gateway Pundit, OAN,  NY Post, Fox News, FreeRepublic etc.

Yet they swing more to the solid Liberal 2.0 or lean RadLiberal side than to the solid right wing side as mentioned above (good but unbias would be even better) so what I write below holds water. Maybe AllSides and Media Bias Fact Check can use weighted measures to truly find out if the MSM is Liberal 2.0 or not

There's been so many times I see a controversy in the MSM play out in real time where the reporting does not match reality. James Damore for example , with all of these it reaches a point where everyone accepts that skewed reporting as the historically accurate MSM depiction. Bring up James Damore with nearly anyone today and you're told he was worse than he really is, see here for example

Liberal 2.0 bias (not a Liberal bias as user claims) : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AReliable_sources%2FPerennial_sources&diff=prev&oldid=1058700530

Bari Weiss points out this Liberal 2.0 bias https://www.commentary.org/articles/bari-weiss/resist-woke-revolution/?s=04

Millennials and Gen Zers have been more prone to be more open to being Liberal 2.0 since birth than any previous generation (Gen Z is not the most conservative generation since WWII that is a myth) and the vast majority of our MSM, and power positions in society are run by Millennials and Gen Zers. So since they are vastly Liberal 2.0 this is reflected in the Liberal 2.0 bias in the MSM, corporations etc

It’s a large schism between left wing, liberal 2.0 and right wing media, where the right wing completely has no idea what people on the left or the liberal 2.0 sides are really saying because of how warped their right wing info ecosystem is. Their information overlords like Tim Pool and Tucker Carlson never show them a (competent) person on the left or even liberal 2.0 side speaking for themselves on the issues they care about

I type in tons of competent leftists and liberal 2.0ers into search results for right wing media and said media barely mentions them since if they did it would destroy the right wing's fake false stereotypes of the left and to a much much lesser extent the liberal 2.0ers

Or where the left wing completely has no idea what people on the left or the liberal 2.0 side are really saying because of how warped their left wing info ecosystem is. Their information overlords like Sameera Khan, Max Blumenthal, Caleb Mauphin, Hassan, Glenn Greenwald never show them a (competent) person on liberal 2.0 side speaking for themselves on the issues they care about. 

As with the points above, this misrepresentation of the other 2 sides also happens on the liberal 2.0 side too where they too misrepresent the non liberal 2.0ers

Yes Liberal 2.0ers deserve to be accurately represented in the right wing media and left wing media because Liberal 2.0ers aren’t always wrong and maybe we can find common ground with them more if we accurately portray them in the non liberal 2.0 media 

All sides need to improve on this (see here , here, here, here , here, here and here for more. Also see here, here and here)

If every Millennials and Gen Zers was born in the 19th century or early to early mid 20th century they would have been as or more Conservative than Mike Pence oreven Gavin McInnes

* Corporate Liberal 2.0 tyranny is a HUGE slippery slope and major issue we need to fix now (for example see this)  . Also see this for more. Too many corporations also wrongly donate mostly to Republican politicians and causes and that is bad too. These corporations do that to prevent unionization, true equality, Socialism,Communism etc . Why can’t Corporations be neutral? *

* We need to stop Corporate Tyranny of the Liberal 2.0ers huge takeover of corporate America, and thus Liberal 2.0ers’ woke and censoring mob in the corporate lane. This article reflects more of my thoughts on this and how to fix this issue with corporations. If corporate America supports Liberal 2.0 causes maybe those causes aren’t as great as they seem *

* I am part syndicalist and trying to boost the union memes and stop corporate tyranny.

I reject Liberal 2.0ers weaponization of corporate America against non Liberal 2.0ers views and values.  Corporate SJWism does not help oppressed people.  See this post here for more which happens to reflect my views on this along with this post here (archive)

We have to convince corporations from engaging in activities which undermine free enterprise, individualism, liberty, small government, freedom from oppression, freedom of speech, our health and of course the rule of law.  *

* Companies need instead go back to their main role—as fiduciaries for their investors. 

The easiest implementation is the transfer of company shares from investors to workers. *

Essentially the easiest to conceive form of socialism would be to change virtually nothing about society currently, except private ownership of companies would be phased out in favor of co-op style corporations. 

You can check out places like power bar, land of lakes, and mandragon for info about large co-ops.  r/socialism

* They should remain neutral on hot button wedge political issues. 

from HBR:

"Of course, there is certainly a place for thoughtful neutrality. In our studies, participants were generally much more tolerant of neutral messaging if it seemed to reflect genuine uncertainty or middle-ground beliefs, rather than coming across like a strategic dodge. Moreover, people don’t punish neutrality that they don’t notice: If you can avoid taking sides entirely by steering clear of forums in which politics come up, inconspicuous silence will not incur the same trust penalty as conspicuous neutrality."

See this article for some background on this *

We must restore a healthy respect for and understanding of free enterprise, liberty, and our lived in experiences including by helping oppressed people the right way , all of which are being corrupted by corporate oligarchs.

* The US’s major corporations increasingly are choosing political sides in the battle between liberty and woke tyranny.  *

* The largest threat to human liberty isn’t big government anymore, it is big business (see here and here).  Corporations have caused our inflation which should be relabeled corporate greedflation *

Corporate America has begun to mirror our country’s higher education—a space dominated by Liberal 2.0ers and for Liberal 2.0ers, but with more power to stifle any opposition to the Liberal 2.0ers cultural orthodoxy and dominance.

The structure of the institutions basically select for these kinds of personalities.  Much like how corporate hierarchies reward Dark Triad personality types, the wokest sectors of academia and digital media select for this particular brand of hyper-sanctimonious BPD.

They can never be truly purged from the system because it's not an anomaly that they were there in the first place.  The only reason she'll find herself shitcanned is because she made too much noise.  Normally this kind of blacklisting and professional sabotage happens on the down-low.  She probably would have been much more successful in ruining these student's careers if she had just denigrated them privately. (from stupidpol)

Here is something that perfectly ties all of this stuff together

* Corporate tyrants (like see here , see here, here, here, here, here, this post, here) are dictating to us what ideas and beliefs are ‘acceptable’.  Like see here, here and here along with this here and here   *

They are basically the PMC. PMC is like Neoliberalism if not part of it and at the very least using the term PMC can provide useful analysis into this whole concept. 

The PMC have implemented this style of management throughout corporate hierarchies, and it's culturally diffuse now because it's also the mechanics of social media moderation.  stupidpol.  I am against PMC and want to abolish the PMC. See  here (archive), here (archive) for more

* For people to dissent from this corporate elite makes you become targeted against the increasingly-expanding corporate promotion of the Big Corp Liberal 2.0’s extreme radical (but radical can be a good thing too) agenda in the US and around the planet.  Corporations use social concerns as marketing campaigns and don't try to actually fix said problems. See here and here for more *

I actually love where your head’s at on this, but I think it goes a little deeper than you think. Corporate Values are an attempt to unite us in pursuit of a common goal, but they fall short, and if you haven’t already figured out why, please read The Lord of the Flies.  unpop op

"It just continues to be one of the most surreal aspects of American political life that the political party that incessantly claims it is the sole bulwark against "fascism" has, as one of its central tactics, the union of state and corporate power to censor the citizenry." Glenn Greenwald 

These Liberal 2.0 Corporations are acting more and more like the 1920s and 1930s literal Corporate fascists in Europe, see here, here and here for more. This is because corporations are embracing Anarcho Capitalist type greed (like see this post here).  Or at best like a Censorship Industrial complex/State Corporate Complex

From here: To quote Chris Hedges: “We have to begin, especially in an age of corporate totalitarianism, to stop asking ourselves whether resistance is going to work ...

Corporate Fascists are defunding, censoring (like here), deplatforming, and silencing non-Liberal 2.0s voices in the public sphere, eliminating pluralism, freedom of speech and civil debate (Alliance defending freedom "How we're counteracting the threat of corporate censorship")

Corporations as a whole want freedom of speech but they don't want real people to have freedom of speech which is hypocritical and wrong. See here for more and here

* As mobs get the upper hand, intimidation spreads. This is in part due to corporate lobbying see here , here for more on that  *

Non Liberal 2.0 Americans views are being marginalized and increasingly are being cancelled.

It's the system, not individuals. Ethical CEOs tend to make less profit, therefore are more likely to get fired, less likely to get promoted. Sociopaths make the most money, are therefore disproportionately represented at the tops of corporate hierarchies. (from Anarchism reddit)

* Tactically, the Liberal 2.0ers are working using a top-down, bottom-up model along with an outside-in to craft culture to their approval at breakneck speeds. 

From the top, Liberal 2.0 CEOs and their board members use shareholder’s money in order to advance Liberal 2.0 policy. From the bottom, woke employees dictate the plan of attack for the corporation while non-partisan or non Liberal 2.0 employees remain silent, out of fear of them being cancelled . This article explains how corporations can better help their employees as a whole not be oppressed

Also, from outside, legions of sufficently-funded outside investors, Liberal 2.0 activists, NGOs, and MSM members apply pressure to companies to get them to work in lockstep with the power-hungry, political Liberal 2.0.   See here for more

This meritocratic scheme set up is known as corporate hierarchies and corporate hierarchies like all hierarchies are wrong. We have to abolish these corporate hierarchies and their wealth concentration .I am against corporate hierarchies and all hierachies. See here and here for more  *

This is what companies should be like. I also support worker co-ops (but autonomous non corporate types only), decentralization and horizontalism (like see here) as alternatives to corporate hierarchies to truly bring equality for workers and consumers alike

Let's open the borders too (my way) and remove corporate hierarchies from the job market.

Then we could just remove currency and social hierarchy while we're at it too. It's almost like the vast majority of modern society is b.s used to control us.   anarchy101

I support Mutualism sphere ideologies like Agorism In the Agorism Primer it mentions that free market advocates should be anti capitalist. Additionally, in Agorist literature it mentions we need to flatten corporate hierarchies, be anti wage labor, as well as workers owning their own means of production. It approaches socialism in its findings for sure, if not arriving at it.

So here is where the Liberal 2.0 really kicks in. Neoliberalism (which is part of Liberalism 2.0) is the idea that unrestricted global free trade is the best pathway to bettering the lives of everyone, particularly the most impoverished populations of the global South. It facilitates the production of goods sold by corporations in rich countries to rich consumers by workers in poor countries, who are easier to exploit and have fewer legal protections. 

This increases profit margins for multinational corporations, which facilitates obscene executive pay while at the same time suppressing the wages of workers in wealthy nations, who are now in direct competition for jobs with workers who will labour long hours for a few dollars a day.

The profits generated by this system also provide some benefits to shareholders in wealthy nations, where most workers have lost the benefit of pensions and rely on their investments in private companies to grow sufficient wealth for retirement.

The "liberal" in neoliberalism refers to corporations, not workers.

Instead I support the idea of most people being free agents who can choose their own work and be their own boss, free from coercive systems like corporate hierarchies and this is called anarchy.

From agile reddit: What corporate hierarchies value most is not effectiveness, but compliance. Everybody gets along with each other. You can have a great career if you are shipping buggy products using outmoded approaches as long as those approaches are the company norm. Try something new and if you don't get perfect results, your career is at risk.

The standardization they are trying to achieve is all about conformance and compliance. Some manager will get a good review because they drove an initiative to standardize.

And, if you stick around, you will likely see another manager get a good review for doing the exact opposite.

mma I means sadly society is predicted on corporate hierarchies exploiting the hell out of people. That is an absolutely messed up

If anything behavior like this is socioeconomically unsustainable in the long-term and is doing serious societal damage as a result of stagnation in currency flow (because money exists to be spent and people need to have it to consume at a level relative to production), encourages societal issues like mental health problem's, or in a system with privatized healthcare increases the risk of serious illness impacting productivity, and often puts people in a position of desperation as inflation rates (also largely being artificially accelerated by companies increasing prices without due cause) outstrip the average rate of pay.

Also I echo David Graeber (from TIL): "It's quite well explained in Graeber's book, I think it's a must read if you think so.

The phenomenon of people doing "essential jobs" being criminally underpaid while being hounded and corporate hierarchies being agglomerated with middle-management who achieve nothing is addressed specifically."

Whether this is under the guise of “ESG” (environmental, social and governance), “wokeness,” or “stakeholder” Capitalism, make no mistake, these terms are only really cover for Liberal 2.0ers weaponizing big business in order to achieve their radical, political goals. See here for more

Though the fact a few corporations own so many corporations and so on makes that somewhat understandable, look at how many corporations and entities  CBSViacom, Disney, Time Warner, NBCUniversal own for example). Also see here

Some of them are heavily influenced by Liberal 2.0 lobby and advocacy groups who organize and coordinate attacks on those corporations through ‘SJWism’ and other tactics until those corporations give in. It's like a real life Stepford Wives (I love that movie).   

Just look at how they one by one they pretended to become woke in 2020 (mary sue), how all of these corporations punished innocent Russians for a war they had nothing to do with, look at how all of these corporations fire or go after people who are far left (i.e tankies), Authoritarian Conservative ,Blue Dog Democrat (Krysten Sinema bathroom incident at ASU in 2021) or Left Wing (like their attacks on Hassanbi, Breadtube, Destiny, Jimmy Dore, Krystal Ball, Tim Dillion, Kyle Kulinski etc).

* Look at how these corporations use diversity to cover for their corrupt and anti worker labor practices (like here, here, here, here and here) and attack everything that us reasonable private citizens stand for in their tone deaf, tone deaf virtue signaling fests.  

Corporations oppress their workers and that is wrong  *

By defeating corporate fascism we can get the workers to take control of the means of production (and have progressive policies for their working conditions including co-ops until then) and stopping forced labor that these corporations use

I am also against small businesses (i.e petite bourgeois).   See here , here (archive) and here for more. And yes this may be something to consider too

Liberal 2.0ers own most of the western media and make up the majority of Liberalism 2.0 . So Liberal 2.0ers then promote other Liberal 2.0ers into power positions. Liberal 2.0s then feed constant Liberalism 2.0 through that mechanism

But I at the end if the day, I could care less. Let the Cathedral go after non normies. It is no skin off my back. As long as they aren’t going after me, it’s all good.  If conservatives and other non normies don’t put as much effort as Liberal 2.0ers in creating their own bias in the media ,they only have themselves to blame

Furthermore, I can live with corporations being woke and Liberal 2.0 since they are fulfilling progressives and left wing/nihilist-enlightenment goals. 

Like King Camp Gillette and Upton Sinclair's 1920s goal of bringing about a socialist utopia by means of a giant corporation. Their corporation would vertically integrate to control the production process from the point of extracting the raw materials to the distribution of the product to consumers, while ensuring equality of wealth and working conditions among its members. 

Essentially, the idea was that economies could more easily be centrally planned through the use of enormous corporations enjoying grants of monopoly privilege.  See here for more 

Also like pointed out here "This was no accident. Those who have studied the genesis of this annexation know that it was a deliberate “long march through the institutions.” That campaign was conceived in the late 1960s by the violent German activist Rudi Dutschke, a disciple of the non-violent but much more dangerous Frankfurt School academic Herbert Marcuse, who approved of Dutschke’s plan." See more here

Another perspective on this can be found here. See this, this, this , this section of my blog for related points on this