Exh commieterthh
My favorite political commentators (modern): David Auerbach, Krystal Ball, Ben Burgis, Contrapoints, Destiny (Steven Bonnell), H.A Goodman, Glenn Greenwald, Ryan Grim, Van Jones, RFK Jr, Aaron Mate, Joe Rogan, David Sirota, Jon Stewart, Bari Weiss
My near favorite political commentators (modern) Brian Becker ,Donna Brazile , David Brooks ,Chris Calliza, Jimmy Dore, Ronan Farrow, David A French, Katie Herzog, BGJ, Ana Kasparian Bill Maher, Olivia Nuzzi, Ronald Radosh, Joy Reid, Sheldon Richman, Jon Stossel
My almost near favorite political commentators (modern) : Wolf Blitzer, Max Blumenthal, Tom Brokaw, James Carville, Saagar Enjeti ,Michelle Goldberg, David Graeber, Haz, Hugh Hewitt, Gayle King, Chris Matthews, Garland Nixon, Hassan Piker, Kristen Powers, Sam Seder, Tavis Smiley, Jake Tapper, Jessica Tarlov, Amanda Terkel, Vaush, Sydney Watson, Juan Williams, Bob Woodward
My almost almost near favorite political commentators (modern): Erin Burnett Norman Finkelstein, David Frum, Sam Harris, Chris Hayes, Eoin Higgins, Ezra Klein, Rachel Maddow, Dick Morris, Piers Morgan, Benjamin Norton, Soledad O’brien, Anya Parampil, Steven Pinker, Geraldo Rivera, Dave Rubin, Elijah Schafer ,Toure, Cenk Uyghur ,Joe Walsh
My in ballpark of being almost almost near favorite political commentators (modern): Martin Bashar, Mitch Bothero, Will Cain, Mary Anne Franks, Jonah Goldberg, Arianna Huffington, Laura Ingraham, Lisa Kennedy, Christian Parenti, Jordan Peterson, Chris Rufo, Howard Stern, Andrew Sullivan, Matt Taibbi, Chuck Todd, Michael Tracey
Slightly above below average commentators who are reliable broken clocks (if I am being generous): Brent Bozell , Cassandra Franklin, Seth Mandel, Mary Matalin, Trevor Noah, Andy Ngo, Michael Savage (he was at MSNBC for years), Ben Shapiro,
Commentators who have a face for radio, a voice for silent radio/tv, and political views for the sheeter but who also have a few redeeming qualities and who also are still ways off from being the worst commentators: James Dobson, Gavin McGinnes , Dennis Prager, Aaron Rupar, Chris Rufo
Commentators I loathe the most (modern): Hunter Avellone ,Michael Brown (Townhall.com), Ann Coulter, Steven Crowder (he has a punchable face), Matt Drudge, Mike Enoch, Megyn Kelly, Bill Kristol, Taylor Lorenz, Michael Medved, Jennifer Rubin, Nicole Wallace, George Will, Kevin D Williamson, Jason Wilson (a disgrace to the Jason given name)
Good political commentators who are my almost near favorite political commentators (historical) : Michael Brooks, Larry King, Walter Kronkite, Ed Murrow, Andy Rooney, Tony Snow
Decent political commentators who are my almost almost near favorite political commentators (historical) Horace Greeley, Oliver Wendell Holmes ,Peter Jennings, Charles Krauthammer
Political commentators who could have been in the ballpark of being halfway decent or even pretty okay in another world, but in our world were horrible commentators: Don Imus, Rush Limbaugh
News Media sites and newspapers I like the most: Fee (Foundation for Economic Education), Grayzone, Jacobian, Mediate, Medium, Newsweek, NY Post, Quilette, RT, Sputnik, The Nation, World Socialist Website
News Media sites and newspapers I nearly like the most: BBC, Canada Free Press, Cato Institute , Daily Mail, Deseret News ,Global Times, MSNBC (1990s, and last decade when commentators I like are on it), Reason, Salon, The Hill, Toronto Sun, Washington Examiner, Vox, Wall Street Journal
News Media sites and newspapers I almost nearly like the most: Al Jazeera TV, Axios, Bloomberg, Business Insider, Buzzfeed, Epoch Times, Libcom, Politico, Slate, The Atlantic, The Guardian, The Telegraph, USA Today, Washington Times
News Media sites and newspapers I just about almost nearly like the most: American Conservative (I only read and like articles on AC by Left Libertarian Sheldon Richman), Blaze, Christian Science Monitor ,CNN, NY Times, Politofact, Washington Post
News Media sites and newspapers I nearly just about almost nearly like the most: National Review, New Republic, Zero Hedge
News Media sites and newspapers I have a like-HATE relationship with: Fox News
News Media sites and newspapers I hate the most: Breitbart, Capital State Journal, Drudge, Forbes, Huffpost, Raw Story, Redstate
News Media sites and newspapers I nearly hate the most: Bulwark, Conservative Inc, Daily Beast, NBC News, Newsmax, NPR, Orlando Sentinel, The Independent, Time, Weekly Standard
My favorite writers (modern):
Noam Chomsky, Roderick Long, Neil deGrasse Tyson
My near favorite writers (modern):
Kevin Carson
My favorite writers (historical):
Emma Goldman, Frederick Hayak, MLK Jr, CS Lewis, Ada Lovelace, Rosa Luxemberg, George Orwell, PJ Proudhon, Mark Twain, Booker T Washington, Clara Zetkin
My near favorite writers (historical)
Mikhail Bukinin, Frederick Douglas, Karl Marx, Frederick Nietzsche Peter Kropotkin, Murray Rothbard, Betrand Russell, Oswald Spangler ,Max Stirner, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Benjamin Tucker
My almost near favorite writers (historical)
Hannah Arendt ,Aristotle, Antony Flew, Milton Friedman, John Stuart Mill, Ayn Rand, Adam Smith, Andy Warhol
My nearly almost near favorite writers (historical)
Bible writers, Billy Graham, Steven Hawking, Plato, William Shakesphere, Leo Tolotsoy, Mary Whitehouse
My almost nearly almost near favorite writers (historical)
Billy Sunday
Didn’t make cut and a director’s cut of my own commentary about the commentators and works
My thoughts on Libcom.org here and here
I was a fan of Candace Owens (fake black white supremacist eso fash f yockeyism 3p if she really was like leo felton) before she had her heel turn. Maybe somewhere deep vegetatively inside of me , I still agree with Candace from time to time since her right wars turn
I am fine with some of Jason Whitlock ‘s thoughtful and insightful political views even if I don’t usually agree with him
Dave Rubin is conservative, right center or right wing. He is not alt right or far right and anyone who says he is is a Cultural Marxist
Hameer Jhavedi is a fool and is full of madness (madness as in her being insane) for falsely smearing Rubin as alt right. Our Liberal 2.0 MSM wants to label anyone to the right of AOC or Joe Biden as 'extremists' or 'alt right' or 'far right' in order to scare people from finding out the truth about the Liberal 2.0ers and Democrats.
It's the truth, they use labels like alt right and far right on non extremists like Dave Rubin, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Rand Paul because they are threatened by them and their popularity so they hit them with smears. It's the truth
You would have to be mentally handicapped to believe that Dave Rubin is alt right or far right.
So to the Liberal 2.0 morons, anyone who dares have their own views that don't mesh with Liberal 2.0ers views is an 'extremist' Like the Liberal 2.0ers have the only way forward for our country right? GTFO with the trash man. NO NO NO
Over 90 percent of Americans polled by Gallup said that Rubin was politically between right center and right wing.
Alex Stein is a right wing (wikipedia) provocateur (many msm outlets)but he is NOT far right.
Rangerkid51 is nuts and a weirdy
Nickkk Fuentes and the Groypers
Nick Fuentes and his Groypers should be banned from entering Europe, Australia-NZ-Oceania, Asia, Middle East, South America and Africa forever until they become left wing or lean left. I am going to harass , blackmail and bribe every country in those places to permanently ban Nick Fuentes and his goon squad from entering those places forever
In most alternate realities, Nick Fuentes's alternate reality clones never left North America at any point in the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s etc
I love the way Right Wing Watch's views on Nick Fuentes and I think in some unique way they are pretty much spot on with the solid majority of their takes on him
This article by the Grayzone reflects my views on Nick Fuentes and the whole world he has been a part of in a lot of ways. This article followup also is pretty solid on Nick Fuentes too and this similar article here is also a good analysis of the whole Nick Fuentes situation
This article gives fine insight into Alex Jones collapse into blatant alt rightism and shows how A1 and the Groypers have a lot of explaining to do if they ever come to their senses and make a face turn. At the very least said article shows some behind the scenes insight on the Groypers and Nick and their alt right MMORPG
Many Groypers unfortunately hold racist and antisemitic views. Nick Fuentes is careful to position the Groypers not as white supremacists but rather as “Christian Nationalists” adl
Nick Fuentes’s AF is for all intents and purposes as cringe as reddit atheism ever was, except religious. And by so doing that, Nick and AF give new life to old atheist arguments that religion is antithetical to reason. Due to them shoring up their crumbling AF base and coalition with dogmatic browbeating. Rehashing religious appeals replaces having substance as a member. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/america-first-is-dead-travis-leblanc-disavows-nick-fuentes-af.129698/page-2
Their Catholicism is especially a huge problem since they live up to the old US stereotype that Catholics https://kiwifarms.net/threads/america-first-is-dead-travis-leblanc-disavows-nick-fuentes-af.129698/page-2 u
Nick Fuentes has a underlying every Superiority Complex and is a frightened little child who fears they aren't accepted and loved. It's why he is who he is. https://twitter.com/profgalloway/status/1597643052746559488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Nick Fuentes and the Groypers are on my Arya Stark like cancel list. Unlike Arya I only plan to CANCEL Nick and the Groypers instead of harming them (Nick is.still on Gab, Rumble, Banned tv)
I am trying to get Nick Fuentes and his Groypers permanently banned from traveling to Europe, Oceania, Asia, Africa, Middle East, South America. I have emailed people i need to to make this happen and if I have to physically prevent him from going to those places as a last resort i will. My reason is Nick and his Groypers are demonic and evil and they don't deserve to go to those places. I don't want them corrupting the minds of people in those places. Anyone who doesn't agree with me is a retard
I view Nick Fuentes and the Groypers exactly as Steven Bonnell (Destiny) and Destiny’s subreddit redditors views Nick Fuentes and Groypers (so negatively obviously).
Here is a message from a Alt Leftist (me) to the evildoer Alt righter Nick Fuentes and his evildoer Alt righter Groypers ,
“in the name of justice, stand down fiends Arthur Fire Emblem fates
I have zero tolerance for you and your Groypers bs you bourgeois
rebel scum dozer boss first battle fire emblem gaiden to Alm and his allies
scoundrels!” Arthur Fire Emblem fates
whole message to them is in spirit of Andrew Cuomo to proud boys
Destiny needs to stop being a Nick Fuentes apologist
Here is Destiny fawning over being a Nick Fuentes revisionist (revisionism is of the devil)
“ When Nick makes a joke, about how like something about Jewish people running everything, it's a joke that's funny to him and that's funny to his audience, but it's funny for two reasons. One is because there might be a bit of truth to it (Destiny’s words not mine) but two is because it triggers the fuck out of observers who don't know what's going on. What'll happen is people will spend all of their time attacking Nick and Groypers, "you guys are all antisemitic", "you want to fucking kill everybody", but that's not really what their movement's about, that's not really what they talk about, that's not really what's going on. ...It's actually like they'll laugh and they'll say it, but they're laughing because you think you caught them, but they're laughing because you're taking it so seriously. I think we've moved to so many layers of hyper irony that it's hard to know what the fuck's going on."
Destiny did say in one of his videos that if you were to “sit Nick Fuentes down with a lie detector and interrogate his every belief, he’d come across as a lot more moderate than you would think” [paraphrasing] reddit destiny
Per this post we have to find better labels for Nick. Destiny says that Nick also doesn’t meet his criteria for being a Nazi (but Destiny has since come to his senses per this thread). But then again see this and this
Nick Fuentes talked about his father's Jewish roots on a livestream I am told. Nick also boasted about being a yiddish Jew on Twitter. So I can’t tell who he really hates or what the fuck his whole gig is reddit destiny gab
One thing is for sure, Nick Fuentes isn't a liberal, he's most likely a neofascist. Nick says he's not a neofasicst but his viewpoints prove otherwise. shitliberalssay subreddit rpl naughtzie with neofascist, they also say fascist but i already say fascist just below
However, I do know for a fact that Nick Fuentes is a fascist and this proves it
If on the one in a googleplex chance that Nick and the Groypers are REALLY moderate instead of being the fascists they are , then I would remove Nick and the Groypers from my Arya Stark like cancel list, but I still would be against Nick Fuentes and the Groypers but from an Anti Centrist perspective (since I also am Anti Centrist), instead of from an Anti Hard right-Anti Radical Right perspective that I currently am against them from
Destiny once said that if Nick Fuentes would drop his most extreme positions he’d be super palatable to the MAGA scene, but if Nick doesn’t he’ll keep hitting a ceiling for mainstream acceptance reddit destiny
If Nick Fuentes can defeat the white supremacist accusations toward him (which can only be done by the MSM focusing on calling Nick a booger eating incel and not focusing on his more politically charged and more awful rhetoric) he may be able to rebrand himself. reddit destiny
Nick’s post Destiny angle has been full of lots of "alright guys, pull it back" when his chats get too wild with his anti black racism or chauvinism. reddit destiny
There is a zero % change that kkKanye West has not asked Nick about his dum dum views on this stuff, or someone has attempted to bring it too Nick’s attention. reddit destiny
Nick’s common rebuke of "its all for laughs, I only wanna to stand up for my race-ethnicity like other people get to stand up for their race-ethnicity" tricks A LOT of people (like with the NoJumper interview). Im guessing this hoodwinking by Nick also worked on West. reddit destiny
Yet, if you push on specifics on Nick, you can make him agree to wild stuff (like getting him to say that 1 million white atheist liberals are better then 1 millions god fearing catholic BIPOC people) which the majority of us can easily see as utterly and inherently unacceptable, bigoted and ridiculous. This also proves that Nick is a fake Catholic reddit destiny
I want to deradicalize Nick and Groypers (like some destiny redditors think Destiny might be secretly trying to do to nick) along with the rest of the 90 percent of Americans who are to the right of me on political issues. Trolls like Nick and his Groypers are a higher priority to me due to the threat they pose to marginalized groups including Jews like myself. See this for more .
Though forcing Nick to stick to his pledge of putting love, faith and virtue at the center of politics and to not be hateful, hostile and scornful and to distance himself from the 'further right' (yeah right) extremists and to not say dumb ass things in public (ya know what things I mean) would be a pretty damn good start for that catboy Naughtzie (nick fuentes said as much telegraph c March early 10s 2023)
Nicky Fuentes had lil gal type of tantrum while in line for his Barth burger at In n Out burger in LA. Nick acts like a toxic masculine thug. Nick needs to learn self control gab
A lot of people view Nick Fuentes as an antichrist parasite, and I am sure they have good reasons for feeling that way gab
The state apparatus (tankie.fandom.com (anti tankie wiki) says that should be used instead of deep state since deep state is a rw reactionary term)sends Nick against their foes and he has already hurt many potential leaders and communities. Nick is now having a mind bogglingly negative influence on Kanye and is sending Kanye’s career to hell. This political sideshow is not gonna be a serious political movement, it's gonna be a hilarious disaster. gab
I am also against other extremists like Groyper subgroups and Groyper connected groups including Goyim TV, Patriot Front and Blood Tribe. They are freakshows and and their views are evil, gross , extremely ignorant and stupid and inhumane (Nick Fuentes telegraph 2023 replaced inorganic w inhumane and added evil into this, also rpl nicks low iq w extremely ignorant and stupid
Here is my reaction to the Buffalo shooter Payton Gendron stanning for Nick Fuentes on Cozy TV in 2022
Nick doesn't have a basement. He lives with his parents due to the fact he really can't quit whining gab
You know, numerous people come out and say, well, Nick Fuentes is terrible, you know, and say he’s a repugnant person. They don’t want to speak about Donald Trump. They say, but Trump is not filled with antisemetism sentiment or Trump is not an antisemite. They carve out of that. Trump is not a bad guy. He should not have had Nick at the table.” Joy Reid
However the problem is, the rest of the things that Nick Fuentes said — imho, that doesn’t seem any different than fundamentally what the Republican party platform is. Republicans don’t believe in elections (compare that my view on elections here Joy Reid
Republicans don’t as a matter of course care for the idea of democracy (which differs from my views on Democracy/Liberal Democracy like in this post) .Case in point, some GOP senator said democracy is a bad idea. Joy Reid
Republicans don’t like the notion of women controlling their spaces or having bodily/personal autonomy Joy Reid tweaked
Republicans obviously wouldn’t mind having a dotp or totalitarian leader because they don’t believe that elections matter due to them losing faith in elections (when this or this would be a good alternative for them on that front assuming they can move left of Bernie Sanders). Republicans don’t know how to win elections anymore so this is natural Joy Reid tweaked
Republicans think they should just decide who the president of the US is. They loathe the culture. Republicans are mad that the culture is too friendly to LGBTQ people Joy Reid
I am going to pressure get reddit admins and my real life friend Ellen Pao (in person) to force the mods on every Kanye West subreddit to create a zero tolerance policy on those subreddits toward Nick Fuentes as to only allow posts that hate on , vehemently disagree with and mock Nick as much as every other subreddit not named Destiny currently does while deleting any comments that are even slightly sympathetic to Nick. I willnever allow tnose subreddits to be like Destiny’s subreddit toward Nick .
That also means every user who posts about Nick Fuentes on Kanye subreddits must call Nick a racist, fascist , anti jewish sentiment filled troll and to criticize Nick on only from the left (any Redditor on any subreddit who is to the right of Nick on any issue should be deplatformed forever)
Nick is upset that he was snubbed for the Anti Semite of the year award. I heard he is blaming the Anti Semite of the year award committee for going woke by handing the award out to a poc (Kanye West).But ole Nicky has to realize that Kanye earned that award all by himself without any help from the Anti Semite of the year award committee tying to diversify the award recipients
Andrew Torba is not anti semetic. His site Gab through its very nature attracts that certain reactionary/alt right (and by extension anti semetic) crowd. He is a free speech absolutist who will stubbornly pass away on the hill like Ahab did trying to catch Moby Dick
Andrew Torba makes offputting , non Jewish friendly barbs about Jews sure, but he never engages in actual anti semetism himself. A better word to describe Andrew Torba is Christian Chauvinist , Anti Zionist on steroids and Cultural Reactionary
Bill Mahers was wrong in his interview with Benjamin Netanyahu for trying to keep bringing up anti-semitism and trying to force Netanyahu to wallow in past shame/victim-hood. Benjamin Netanyahu had the best type of response to the bullying he received as a child “ "Yeah, when I was 13 bullies kicked sand in my eyes at the beach - but I'm in my 60's now and run one of the most successful countries in the World".Fuck you Bill Maher you loser.
My issues with Tucker Carlson: Tucker Carlson’s brand of populism is a populism he agrees with all leftist /liberal 2.0 lean leftist critiques of "the elite" and he tells you that it's all true and that you're not nuts. stupidpol
But then Tucker redirects you to some culturally reactionary b.s that will change nothing. He totally knows what he's doing; Tucker is inoculating his audience from true critique by tying it to some junk. stupidpol
etc
I have always and will continue to always love Keith Olbermann brilliantly taking down Bill O'Reilly on MSNBC in this early 2009 clip. I echo what Keith Olbermann said in that piece . Bill O'Reilly was an idiot and wrong for his rape comments and for him and Jesse harassing Amanda Terkel.
Seeing that clip never gets old and never loses its luster. MSNBC always provided checks and balances against Bill O'Reilly Faux News propaganda . Bill
Steven Crowder is NOT far right. He is conservative and right wing or right center.
Anyone who believes otherwise is out of touch with our society.
Liberal 2.0 'reporters' Carlie Porterfield and Nikki McCann Ramirez are wrong for writing that Steven Crowder as 'far right'
It would be nice if Rolling Stone and especially Forbes edited their story to remove 'far right' from describing Crowder and instead list him as Conservative, right wing or right center.
Our MSM has become more radically liberal that they now falsely see Steven Crowder as 'far right"
It is so sad that our MSM which is tasked with being neutral and unbias breaks that by falsely labeling Steven Crowder as 'far right'. That is as bias as you can get.
Rolling Stone should stick to music. They covered the Kanye story fairly and decently but here they fail medium time.
The fact that Forbes is now smearing anyone to the right of Joe Biden as 'far right' or smearing Glenn Greenwald as right wing is comical and of course wrong. Forbes is right wing (Liberal 2.0 right wing) and greedy, racist capitalist pigs. They push for worker exploitation and income inequality like that stuff is going out of style.
Glenn Greenwald is more left wing than Forbes and everyone who works at Forbes. Hey Forbes retards, prove to me that Glenn is right wing or even right leaning you stupid bojo fuckheads. I am going to Forbes HQ this year or next year to force Forbes to apologize for falsely labeling Greenwald as right wing and for them to edit that hit piece on him to list him as left leaning, moderate, or liberal.
I won't confront Forbes or Rolling Stone about Crowder since let's face it Steven Crowder said dumb things about Jews recently and he is Alt Liteish but Forbes falsely calling Greenwald right wing is unforgiveable and I have to go to Forbes HQ and confront them for their hit piece of Glenn. It is the moral and good thing to do and Karl Marx would agree with me here
Forbes is a disgrace and needs to be shut down forever. It has become radlib and evil. Forbes is neoliberal trash. It represent everything I hate about politics
People who think Forbes has a liberal media bias are NOT NAZIs. That retard redditor who stupidly said that is steathly supporting Nazis by saying that since he is downplaying Nazis as much as you can by falsely saying what he did above. These moron Liberal 2.0er fools are mentally handicapped if they think someone calling Forbes liberal is anything even remotely close to being a Nazi just by saying that.
That redditor above should be involuntarily placed in a mental hospital for saying what he did above . He is mentally hanidcapped and it shows
I think that Forbes has a Liberal 2.0 media bias (and yes you can be right wing and Liberal 2.0 at the same time, just look at Mitt Romney, Lizard Cheney, Joe Walsh for proof), and if that makes a Nazi to that redditor so be it.. So if me saying Forbes is liberal makes me a nazi then fine I am a Nazi . Now what motherfuckers?
I would call for State media rag NPR to be defunded but this article gives me pause
Nicole Wallace has a point about tolerance I guess but it was framed in a typical Nicole Wallace partisan attack on non Liberal 2.0ers as she has done tens of thousands of times before. Nicole is a horrible commentator and her being on TV causes me severe daily depression
To non right wing Liberal 2.0ers, neocon warmonger, colonialist fascists David Frum, Jennifer 'Pee Wee' Rubin and Max Boot are not your friends and they are horrible, horrible trolls see this for more.
Now even though David Frum is one of the more tolerable bulwark Never trumpers, I like his views on student loan forgiveness and a few other common ground agreements, I still loathe that man for his neocon, warmongering ,colonialism (this prick had the audacity to retweet criticism of pro peace message by leftist Ben Burgis) along with Frum brain throwing Muslims under the bus in order to spread his American values onto other countries. Frum should be rotting in a Hague cell now .
I am a fan of Contrapoints, see here for more
I am a fan of Ryan Grim, view all of his articles here and I agree with most of them. Which articles? Well if you read all my blogs you will have a pretty good clue. (ryan 'post left')
Here are my thoughts on Libs of Tik Tok and there brand of anti idpol
I echo Murray Rothbard on in his speech to the John Randolph Society on the state of The National Review: “And so the purges began. One after another, (William F) Buckley and National Review purged and excommunicated all the radicals, all the nonrespectables. Consider the roll call: isolationists (such as John T. Flynn), anti-Zionists, libertarians, Ayn Randians, the John Birch Society, and all those who continued, like the early National Review etc”
If William F Buckley never made those purges/excommunications at the National review that Murray Rothbard said they made and the National Review still had isolationists, libertarians, Ayn Randians, JBS , anti zionists etc I would be a regular reader and maybe a fan of the National Review. But as it is now, NO WAY JOSE
I support PJ Proudhon, so does that mean I support using Mutualism to rule over the government and economy by myself? See here for my response
Ayn Rand was a crypto Communist and that is a good thing. She was just critiquing Soviet Revisionism. Cope. Twitter Nov 1 22 Henry Lawson's Ghost 🝆@LawsonsGhost Ayn Rand was a Communist. She was just critiquing Soviet Revisionism. Cope. LawsonsGhostFor a People's Republic of Virtue and a community of common destiny for mankind. Wattle Appreciator Terra Australis Nondum Cognitacuriouscat.live/LawsonsGhostJoined August 2022 when I type ‘Ayn Rand was a crypto Communist and that is a good thing. She was just critiquing Soviet Revisionism. Cope’ I also get Twitter links to 4pt tankie Sameera Khans tweets.
Anyone who dislikes both Ayn Rand and Rosa Luxemburg are retards .
I think that Matthew Knowles is UGLY. I hate the way he looks
Frederick Hayak was ok with socialism . He supported the state playing a role in the economy , including having more state run social safety nets. Hayek supported some provision for people who are threatened by the extremes beyond their control.
Hayak said that the necessity of such an arrangement in an industrial society is self evident only in protecting the interests of needy people to protect them against desperate acts .He supported UBI when the US reached a point where there would be no reason not to implement such a policy
Capital State Journal sucks and I hope that the Columbus Post Dispatch puts that Liberal 2.0 propaganda paper out to pasture. They personally attacked and insulted JD Vance and they should be called out for doing that. That is low, unprofessional and shitty, even for them. Calling people sycophants and sadistic because they have different political views is evil, degrading and horrible
They are clearly Neocon and warmongering for santinizing Ukraine who in their sick twisted minds can do no wrong. Do not trust Capital State Journal , they are Conservaphobic and Anti Left, warmongering, neocon trolls who don’t give a fuck about Ohio. They are schills to Ukraine, Globalizationists, China (on trade only), Neoliberalism and Capitalism.
I love CNN being a televised anti-Trump battalion for the last 6 years (Glenn Greenwald label for them). But I am anti neocon and I want militaries to be eventually abolished, so I am anti battalions
The liberal 2.0ers in the US resemble the right wing authoritarianism Glenn Greenwald disliked in Brazil The reason is, in both of those cases Glenn is defining himself as opposed to ways that the defense of the ruling class cannibalizes liberalism. stupidpol tulsi thread
Liberal 2.0ers in contrast are defining themselves in the framework of offering a more democratic type of defense of the ruling class in comparison to the right wing, which means that one that is just more modernized and representative of the whig historicality progress indicates we made stupidpol tulsi thread
Given that we basically in late stage capitalism, this is way more representative of ruling class interests as opposed to the interests of rightoids, which is for all intents and purposes only grieving old relations that capitalism already has left behind. stupidpol tulsi thread
This is the reason that liberal 2.0ers have time and time again led the charge in stuff like the imperialist war on Russia. They chase the more globalized antagonisms of some more modern variant of Western imperialism. This is all that remains of liberal universalism. stupidpol tulsi thread
Glenn Greenwald is incredibly based for documenting all of this degeneration of liberalism 2.0 and thus liberalism stupidpol tulsi thread
He can speak to the right wingers since liberal 2.0ers are in the process of becoming so like the right wing, like in persecuting their enemies in the defense of a power structure that is in crisis and exposing its undemocratic and elite nature. stupidpol tulsi thread
Liberals just do this in a way more fitting this era of capitalism, which is why the right losing. For the lifecme though, I can’t see why people think this means we should support liberal 2.0ers in this self-enslaving 'win'. stupidpol tulsi thread
This is really the problem on the Liberal 2.0, not anything that Glenn Greenwald represents to us. He merely documents the excesses of these 'wins' and all of the new chains which are shackling society.
The Liberal 2.0 currently are behaving in a manner that Glenn Greenwald has previously criticized the righting for, and thus he's criticizing them. This means Greenwald is the opposite of a grifter - he has integrity stupidpol tulsi thread
But why then has Glenn bigged up Jair Bolsonaros anti establishment attributes ? Bolsonaro is more clearly authoritarian than any liberal 2.0 in the west and has threatened to do a coup d tat
Glenn cautions that Lula is not acting populist enough, but instead watering himself down into left liberalism, at the same time that Jair Bolsonaro has climbed in the polls. stupidpol tulsi thread
Glenn is allowed to praise the views of people and parties he was previously if those are views that Glenn agrees with.Glenn is anti establishment and non intervention, Jair is recently anti establishment and non intervention, so Glenn praised that. He still is against Brazil’s right wing , the mote views of Glenn’s they embrace, the less hard he will be on them. stupidpol tulsi thread
Though on Greenwald's recent tweets the closest he comes to writing anything positive about Jair Bolsonaro is just in quoting Noam Chomsky, who was claiming Lula wasn’t connecting enough with people. He also called out pollsters on Twitter for underestimating Jair, because... that was of course true stupidpol tulsi thread.
Reminder that Greenwald's work played a major role in freeing Lula in the first place. He's not "supporting Jair Bolsonaro" only because he isn’t playing the dumb inevitability kayfabe that the libs are so fond of.
Glenn Greenwald said about Jair Bolsonaro vs Lula what Michael Moore said about Donald Trump vs Hilary Clinton before the 2016 election, which turned out to be true. Obviously that doesn't mean Moore is a right-wing Trump supporter stupidpol tulsi thread
"Finally, for imbeciles claiming I'm crying or angry with the result, the reason Lula went from prisoner in 2018 to valid and then winning candidate in 2022 is because our reporting - based on our brave source - is what proved his conviction corrupt and freed him to run this year." Glenn Greenwald
"Glenn Greenwald broke the story that freed Lula from prison. For that same reporting, Bolsonaro sought to put Greenwald *IN* prison—he actually brought charges!
Today on this site: "Glenn must be sad Bolsonaro lost and Lula won."" Edward Snowden
stupidpol Like in the Nathan J Robinson/Glenn Greenwald debate on Bad Faith I get why Glenn Greenwald is on with Tucker so much. He actually believes that liberal 2.0ers (except progressive Liberals or maybe only just Democrats) are a lost cause when it comes to speaking up on the anti-intelligence/surveillance community, and frankly he makes a darn decent case.
The reason he goes on all these right wing shows is due to him genuinely believing that his goals (which are in the end largely relegated to stripping away the surveillance state and the intelligence agencies) can only be had through the MAGA wing of the Republicans (AND tthe progressive Democrats who have constantly been consistent on the issue), since they at least acknowledge that the intelligence agencies are full of doo doo and authentically evil, even if it's just because they believe they undermined Trump. He only truly sees the mainstream of the Democratic Party as a dead end for his goals and as long as the intelligence agencies promote themselves as the "anti-trump" peeps, he's likely right.
It's a very stark debate and a truly honest one. Glenn doesn't hold back and straight up rightfully says "yeah these right wingers are psycho and they lie a ton but they at least have some common ground that I can work with them on, I don't think I can do that with most liberals or democrats these days."stupidpol
stupidpol I really don't see get someone would want to shy away from speaking to right wingers merely because they're retarded.
If you go on a broadcast and you're constantly shouted down and your commentary is very edited, then sure. But if a person with a boat load of viewers is gonna to let you come on and speak to people, then why not?
They already hate leftists and most of them will tune you out, though maybe you also get some dunks and get a few people to agree with your sentiment. It's not actually hard to run circles around rightoids... what's the worstest thing that would happen? They'll call you a commie and dismiss everything you say? Well that's going to happen regardless. So might as well just show up confident in your convictions and speak your truths. stupidpol
stupidpol But then again, if Glenn was going on Tucker Carlson's platform and rightfully pushing back his false talking points, that'd be one thing, but Glenn nods along which is cringe. Bernie Sanders and Michael Brooks , like me wouldn't just smile 'n' nod as Tucker Carlson talked about the Great Replacement b.s.stupidpol
When Glenn Greeenwald shows stuff to 'prove' he is not right wing, sometimes he actually digs a deeper hole which makes him seem right wing or right leaning ironically. In one instance , 3 of the tweets Glenn showed that were proof he was 'leftish'/not right wing (he did this in 2022) are simply generic statements about interviewing left wing candidates and none of them were recent. One of those Tweets was Glenn praising left center (i.e moderate leftist) Jeremy Corbyn (which I agree with), another Tweet was Glenn praising Ilhan Omar: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501652565754273799
"I hope people on the right see how often @IlhanMN takes the correct position, often alone among Democrats. Remember she was the first to warn of the grave dangers of a new War on Terror in the name of 1/6. Disagree with her on many things, but she's her own person. " Btw I echo that Tweet by Glenn on Ihlan Omar and I love Ihlan Omar https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501652565754273799
I have heard some left leaning Liberal 2.0ers say that "Yeah a right wing pundit would definitely use a three year old tweet to dishonestly represent their views while ignoring constant trash talking of the American left and praise for right wing politicians." https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501652565754273799
If no right wing person would ever express positive opinions about a left winger or a lean leftist then maybe perhaps Glenn Greenwald's recent trash talking of US 'left wing' pols and consistent praise of Tucker Carlson is a pretty clear signal to some people where Glenn stands. https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501652565754273799
Again, I concede that Glenn puts too much focus on 'white' culture war grievance 'shitposting' (hot takes/beating dead horse takes ymmv) and he frequently does appear on right wing populist alt lite programs like Tucker Carlton and right wing programs like Laura Ingraham, where Glenn does appear to agree with everything that those people say. So it is not the craziest thing to see how some Liberal 2.0ers may view Glenn as a right-wing pundit even though I do not. https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501652565754273799
If I am to understand Liberal 2.0ers who paint Glenn as a 'right wing' pundit correctly, whenever Glenn does or states anything leftist (or left leaning) it’s merely part of an elaborate ruse to fool the public? Fantastic, but why stop at that? Have such critics of Glenn ever considered applying that type of view to every single leftist and person who leans left? It’s completely possible that they’re all like this! https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501652565754273799
Glenn is really a centrist but he has been a real sh*t heel recently to Liberal 2.0ers and some leftist Liberal 2.0 praxis, but I don't think we can call his positions right wing. I mean even Liberals can be sh*theels to Liberal 2.0ers and leftists too. https://www.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/ucojg7/glenn_greenwald_has_become_a_full_fledged_right/
This article provides some apologia from Liberal 2.0ers on their theory that Glenn is 'right wing'. I won't criticize that piece as it does provide decent food for thought . This article too has a fair decent take on the Glenn right wing thing
I sort of agree with these exerts below and at the very least it better sums up Glenn than Forbes, Phillip Bump, ADL and others who smear him as right wing ever could: wikipedia talk glenn greenwald
"Jan 2023 MSNBC opinion piece: Collectively, these and other lesser-known pundits push a political position that could be called “anti-lib populism.”... A skeptic of my schematic might say that I'm simply describing right-wing populists. Well, not exactly. First of all, these commentators don’t fit neatly into any conventional ideological box (and, complicating things further, never really did very neatly fit on the left). Greenwald’s stated normative views are decidedly not conventionally right-wing."
"March 2022 Slate article: The situation is also a challenge to navigate for a tougher-to-categorize but increasingly popular type of writer often described as anti-anti-Trump. These journalists are exemplified by former Guardian and Intercept reporter Glenn Greenwald, whose stance one might define as … contrarian anti-woke civil libertarianism?... So is it unprecedented trans-ideological consensus or a gripping battle of opposed positions so high-stakes that the outcome could change the course of human history? Who knows! Check back in tomorrow for a just-as-passionate-and-accusatory take on … something! (I included the second part here is just to exemplify the confused nature with which the writer discusses Greenwald)"
"March 2021 New York Magazine article: Greenwald comes out of a tradition of progressive journalism that focused primarily on attacking liberals and the Democratic Party from the left... Greenwald took this impulse even further by positioning himself as a frequent guest on Fox News, where he would reliably bash the Democrats from the standpoint of the “good progressive.”
The distinction between Greenwald’s attacks on the Democratic Party from the left and the Fox News attacks on Democrats from the right has grown increasingly difficult to discern... Greenwald’s primary focus is on foreign policy and national security, where the ideological lines really are blurry enough to construct a halfway-plausible case that Trump is to the left of the Democratic Party." wikipedia talk glenn greenwald
Here is a nice article which shows what a neocon troll Bill Kristol is. Here shows what a hypocrite Bill Kristol is
I am fine with Max Blumenthal interviewing Jeffrey Tucker as mentioned here. It was a fine interview. Association fallacy is a myth. Free association is a good concept.
Max Blumenthal is the son of Sid Blumenthal, and Max lives off a trust fund along with being part of the B-H Clinton dynasty. It should be no shock when Max Blumenthal is nice towards Republicans and is cordial with Tucker Carlson and other right wing media pundits out of shared class interest tankie.fandom (anti tankie site)
Gavin McInnis by his own words alone blurs the line between Right Wing Populism/Alt Lite and Hard Right. So he pretty much says he blurs the line between Right Wing Populism/Alt Lite and Hard Right .
Jordan Peterson is not far right.
He is Traditional Conservative, https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/tav8ii/jordan_peterson_i_am_right_wing/is.Edit: I still contend that this very old video shows he's always been a traditional conservative]
and blurs the line between Right Wing and Right Wing populist-Alt lite.
Jordan Peterson – has lectured on fascist and socialist totalitarianism –for so long. mises inst article on far right
Tim Pool is not far right. He is between Center right and Right Center but adjacent to that
Maybe Tim Pool is liberal by European standards since in Europe liberals are right-wing. similar to https://www.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/jd1hcx/is_tim_pool_a_grifter_lets_watch_his_bizarre/
Tim Pool is basically Alex Jones these days. https://www.reddit.com/r/BreadTube/comments/jd1hcx/is_tim_pool_a_grifter_lets_watch_his_bizarre/
Tim Pool admitted that he has to make reactionary right wing, Alt lite and hard right wing talking points on social media to give them a voice since so many reactionary right wingers Alt lite and hard right wingers have been deplatformed. freerepublic Tim Pool quote on making right wing talking points on twitter since so many right wingers were banned and could not do so themselves
Similarly using Timbah on Toats breakdown of Tim Pool, they say that a lot of his presentation style is crafted in order to deliver reactionary right wing, Alt lite and hard right wing content with a veneer of being a moderate https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/comments/vz21ts/tim_pool_outraged_he_is_clipped_in_raskin_jan_6/
Or to put it cynically, Tim Pool is profiting off of the MAGA culture war grievance movement https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/comments/vz21ts/tim_pool_outraged_he_is_clipped_in_raskin_jan_6/
Maybe he was vaguely left wing back in the Occupy https://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow/comments/vz21ts/tim_pool_outraged_he_is_clipped_in_raskin_jan_6/ but now he is right center adjacent.
Bad faith agitator engages in bad faith agitation for clicks and likes. exhibit 13,474,993.203 https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/uz4gog/tim_pool_has_solutions/
My issue with Tim Pool is that he claims that he is center left but he spends too much of his time criticizing the left and liberal 2.0 and sticking up for 45 and conservatives. https://www.reddit.com/r/TimPool/comments/estjjy/why_is_tim_pool_so_widely_hated/
He spends nowhere near as much time defending whatever center left ideas he says he has. https://www.reddit.com/r/TimPool/comments/estjjy/why_is_tim_pool_so_widely_hated/
It's constantly 'defend Trump defend Trump defend Trump until further notice', so much so that his YouTube channel is basically indistinguishable from an actual rightoid channel, like Steven Crowder. https://www.reddit.com/r/TimPool/comments/estjjy/why_is_tim_pool_so_widely_hated/
Is the left and liberal 2.0 deserving of criticism? Yes, of course, but so is the right a bunch of the time (including 45), and Tim simply turns a legally blind eye to it. He knows his audience is made up of MAGA and he appears to pander to that exclusively. I honestly can't perceive what his true beliefs are or how he is distinguishable from any other self-identifying conservative. https://www.reddit.com/r/TimPool/comments/estjjy/why_is_tim_pool_so_widely_hated/
Counterpoint against my will: Tim’s figment view places himself clearly left of center. He does spend so much energy on each video hyping up Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang and how he vote their way despite all of their apparent flaws. He routinely claims he would not vote Republican. So he doesn't seem to be a fixture as a cook in the right-wing kitchen. https://www.reddit.com/r/TimPool/comments/estjjy/why_is_tim_pool_so_widely_hated/
It does seem when Tim isn’t covering certain hot take topics like wokeness, MAGA grievances and or similar hot take topics, he does seem like a throwback to his Occupy era self with some one nation alt liteism thrown in for good measure
I like how USA Today is a strong supporter of Title IX and feminism as a whole
CNBC market reports are base and neato!!!. My economic views are shaped by CNBC market reports!!! (NOT!) tucker carlson spoof in his twitter profile calling himself a CNBC market analysis
I get a kick out of Vaush calling Conservatives 'evil'
My thoughts on Christian Parenti and his brand of contrarian leftism can be found here
I don’t think that Conservative Ben Shapiro is a far right gadfy. Ben Shapiro is Jewish; Jews and neo-Nazis tend not to get on very well. Ben Shapiro is between Right Center and Right Wing mises inst
Luna Oi is too influenced by Western leftism , like she seems to be here
This article by Salon is decent by their standards(like Andrew Torba saying People magazine’s 2022 article on him and Gab was decent by their standards) even though I view that Salon like Torba viewed that People magazine 2022 article on him and Gab
Kanye West should have done his interview with Tucker Carlson from his car instead of doing his interview with Chris Cuomo from his car
The two reasons that Kanye West did his interview with Chris Cuomo from his car are:
1) Kanye thought his anti judaism sentiment remarks would cause Cuomo to criticize him from the left on the jewish issue, and Kanye never wants Cuomo to criticize him from the left on any issue. This is because Kanye still falsely seems himself as progressive or at worst falsely sees himself as a left wing grifter (in his eyes in the vein of Jimmy Dore ,Kyle Kulinski and Russell Brand) .
Kanye is fine with Chris Cuomo criticizing MAGA nuts, including Donny Trump, Kevin Mkkkarthy, MTG, Lauren Boebert, Mike Cernovich, Nick Fuentes and Alt Righters like Richard Spencer, David Duke, Milo, Jason Kessler from the left since Kanye realizes they are indefensible and thinks he is to the left of them
But Kanye was petrified of Chris Cuomo criticizing him from the left , since in Kanye’s ignorant mind he is a progressive or a left wing grifter (in Kanye’s eyes in the vein of Jimmy Dore ,Kyle Kulinski and Russell Brand) ,so for Cuomo to criticize him from the left would mean (to Kanye) that Chris Cuomo had lumped Kanye in with those other targets of Cuomo’s ire over the years
If this happened, in Kanye’s mind, there is a good chance that it would mean that Chris Cuomo wasn’t only lying about now being moderate and neutral but in fact that Cuomo actually moved leftward of Jeremy Corbyn, AOC etc or was becoming that schrodinger’s Marxist CNN psuedo far left boogeyman that MAGA trolls and far right nuts erected. A Chris Cuomo who in their minds attacked from the left anyone even was slightly to the right of Gabriel Boric or attacked from the left anyone who didn’t trash Trump on Twitter literally every day of the year
By doing his interview with Chris Cuomo in his car, Kanye figured he could just raise his stereo to drown out Cuomo criticizing from the left on the jewish issues. If, in Kanye’s mind, Kanye accidentally heard Cuomo criticize him from the left on the jewish issues, Kanye could get over such criticism real quick since Kanye’s car is like a comfort item and safe space to him
Chris Cuomo’s NewsNation pledge to be ‘moderate’ or ‘neutral’ instead of being the Liberal 2.0 partisan hack he was at CNN may further have played into this line of thinking for Kanye
2) Kanye was self distancing out of spite, doing the interview with Chris Cuomo from his car is very much self distancing
After getting hammered for his anti judaism sentiment views by Cuomo, Kanye went to find safe spaces where he wouldn’t be criticized from the left on jewish issues. That’s why he hooked up with Nick , and did interviews with Tim Pool, Alex Jones and Gavin McInnes.
But each time Kanye was criticized from the left on his views on those alt tech shows except of course by Nick Fuentes, not that Nick not criticizing Kanye from the left on his anti judaism sentiment views is literally going to stop the presses and cause a worldwide epidemic of mass ‘aliens land on Earth’ shock . Nick is certainly no Golda Meir on jewish issues
That Kanye West, who at the time, in his la la land mind was progressive or a left wing grifter (in Kanye’s eyes in the vein of Jimmy Dore ,Kyle Kulinski and Russell Brand) had to worry so much about being criticized from the left by Chris Cuomo, a commentator who was a obvious Liberal 2.0 partisan hack at CNN for years who had since pledged to be ‘moderate’ or ‘neutral’ that Kanye had to do the interview from a safe space (his car) as to thus not be lumped in with MAGA and Alt Righters and other rightoids who long had been extremely deserved and welcome targets of Cuomo’s punching left, is depressing and speaks to this broken MSM and political system problem in volumes, just as much as it speaks to Kanye’s delusions and new found craziness
CNN and Chris Cuomo’s years of Liberal 2.0 bias are a part of a bigger problem with our broken MSM and political system in that even when Cuomo claims to be moderate and neutral, people will still get ptsd of fearing that the CNN Liberal 2.0 partisan Chris Cuomo will make a comeback (even though the brief CNN Liberal 2.0 partisan Chris Cuomo comeback in his interview with Kanye where he grilled Kanye on Kanye’s anti judaism sentiment remarks was a welcome sight and justified no matter how much it harkened back to an era of Liberal 2.0 bias at CNN and in Cuomo’s life. I touch on this a bit here.
In the end, the only reason that Chris Cuomo criticized Kanye’s anti judaism sentiment baseless theories about Jewish people as harshly or directly as he did is because Kanye used the word ‘mafia’ to describe his anti judaism sentiment baseless theories and Chris Cuomo is triggered by words like mafia, Fredo etc as to him at least those words are stereotypical of harmful to Italians like himself (see Fredogate for more).
If Kanye had used a more pc term that wasn’t stereotypical or harmful to Italians to describe his anti judaism sentiment baseless theories about Jewish people, Cuomo would have merely criticized Kanye’s rhetoric in a friendly way like Tim Pool criticized it in a friendly way or Cuomo would only have criticized Kanye’s rhetotic by also criticizing the BDS, and the hard right Israeli political parties who are in a coalition with Benjamin Netanyahu at the same time (to provide balance by criticizing Anti Zionism, anti judaism sentiment and extreme Zionism)
Reactionary chud Tim Pool pushed back against Kanye’s anti judaism sentiment remarks in a solid way and NOT GENTLY like that retard rag Daily Beast said. The Daily Beast people are loser right wing losers
I like Matt Taibbi because as he did with his reporting on the Kyle Rittenhouse story, Matt forms opinions based on independent research and independent thoughts not hive mind Liberal 2.0 collective thoughts . The Democrats are not perfect and not untouchable. They deserve criticism and to say otherwise is fascist
Sean Hannity is a neocon loser. He was wrong to criticize the UN for being antisemetic (UN is not antisemetic, Hannity is antisemetic). There are many reasons to criticize the UN, and faux antisemetism is not one of them FR
Cenk Uyghur and Ana Kasparian are left leaning or left wing. They are absolutely not even remotely anywhere near being right wing. Anyone who falsely labels Cenk or Ana 'right wing' or even right leaning should be thrown in a nut house for at least 1 month (I am dead serious). People who falsely believe that Cenk or Ana are right wing or right leaning are mentally ill and need extreme mental help.
Cenk and Ana have constantly taken left wing/ left leaning positions for years and years, and if they rightfully criticize Democrats/Liberal 2.0ers, they earn that right because frankly if people on the left or left lean can't criticize Democrats /Liberal 2.0ers that means we are living in a modern day USSR or Benny Mussolini Italy or CCP China.
I am ok with this video titled "Jimmy Straw Mans complaints of his Creepiness. Pretends Ryan Grim is afraid to Debate him." which is critical of Jimmy Dore in his obsession with Ryan Grim (source agreeable breadtube)
This article by the Daily Beast perfectly sums up my thoughts on Joe Rogan and the whole Spotify fiasco
"Only the US corporate media could take the person in this video, Joe Rogan, and claim he's a far-right figure.
It happens in part because most of Rogan's critics never watch his show, but also because the media purposely lies and uses "far-right" to malign everyone they dislike." Glenn Greenwald
https://web.archive.org/web/20230213174521/https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1491820389403697165
"The media moronically calls Rogan "right-wing" because this is their only strategy for combatting the explosive growth of independent media taking their audience.
If they can convince people that everyone independent of them is "far-right," at least liberals will be captive." Glenn Greenwald
In other words:
"Hey, all you guys /girls who supported Bernie Sanders and have positions far to the left on key issues than we could dream of having: every time we use your name, we'll call you 'right-wing' because we have to make liberals stay loyal to us."
Love,
Corporate media" Glenn Greenwald
That became the strategy of failing corporate media when Donald Trump came along. They branded themselves liberal #Resistance and became captive to the DNC. Now, they have independent and heterodox platforms thriving and taking their audience, and all they can do is yell: "far-right!" Glenn Greenwald
Here's the life-long (center to center) leftist Russell Brand similarly reacting to now being regularly branded "right-wing" by an embittered media all because he's a critic of corporate media and is thriving on independent platforms like Rumble and his own show. https://t.co/b14L1O0FiL " Glenn Greenwald
Reacting to why the media now brands him "right-wing" as his independent shows explode in growth, Russell Brand explains who really are the people who have abandoned corporate media and now rely on independent media. This is what scares the shit out of them and why they malign it Glenn Greenwald
Rumble, Substack, Callin are all examples of thriving independent platforms that purposely set out to feature a wide range of heterodox and ideologically diverse voices: exactly what corporate media don't do. So they can't admit that's true, so call everyone on them "far right." Glenn Greenwald
"(By the way, the person who made that video compilation of Rogan is
@0rf
, who became known for amazing pro-Bernie videos in 2016. He is also now on Rumble, because of how often he was censored by Google's YouTube, so that of course makes him - say it with me! -- "right-wing.")"
I critique rigidly analytical philosophers who spend all of their time looking for minute fallacies in how other people explain their philosophies, ironically committing a fallacy fallacy and hence missing the forest for the trees. left anarchism subreddit sidebar
I echo the views expressed in this reddit on Vaushites comparing Aaron Mate to Alex Jones
Comments
Post a Comment