Climate Change and science issues

Science

Science and Psychology are not infallible and they are wrong some of the time (they are HUMANS not Gods). Scientists and shrinks are right most of the time, but on Reincarnation, whether or not to suspend disrespectful students, critical race theory, whether or not to spank children, on the everybody gets a trophy on whether hard drugs should stay illegal, on whether Evolution vs Theistic Evolution, on the afterlife, and on some similar things they are wrong.

climate

I support the Conservation of natural resources

I am against the government and social media companies censoring and blocking people who criticize green energy transition.  Such actions by the government and social media companies is FASCIST authoritarian censorship and is against the values that our country was founded on. That is shutting down free speech  by stifling legit criticism of the government and I will not allow the government to do that. I swear to god

Our eco systems (which guarantee life and the survival of thousands of animal and plant species) are being destroyed and these political consequences are of a productive model of accumulation and consumption, which is based on an increasingly extreme capitalism, which has morphed since the 1980s in its latest version of neoliberalism. The concentration of natural resources, by a select few, and those resources‘ waste by certain minorities caused, among other problems, climate change

Our economic crisis is also an environmental crisis/climate change along with the scarcity of natural resources are the origin of most of our geopolitical conflicts and migration criseses. This model has been shown to be speculatively short term,, unsustainable and pretty unfair, causing the enrichment of a minority of the planet’s population at the expense of the overexploitation of natural resources causing problems and exhaustion for future generations.

We should recognize in the face of this impoverishment and access difficulties for the majority and the At the same time, we should recognize the changes in individual behavior to help and support a change in the model that makes our society sustainable

I support environmentalism that is not mistaken about who the real people are

Like the fault of evictions (like during recessions) is not of some families that supposedly lived beyond their means, but is of a speculative and pirate type financial/economic system that has been played in a casino savings of the working people, climate change is similarly not to blame for the consumption habits of humble people but instead for the great economic powers who have benefited from the extractive economy.  I acknowledge that ordinary people develop the habit of recycling, knowing perfectly well that 30 percent of the greenhouse gases emitted into our planet’s atmosphere during the last 50 years comes from only twenty global companies.

Our environmentalism activism must promote a multidisciplinary approach which is included in different fields of political action: including in the management of energy and water resources to land-urban planning and management, housing access and mobility, a smart food and health consumption policy linked to daily problems such as local air pollution and waste management.

I am fine with tools which expands traditional speeches of our green parties aimed mainly at urban, university and activist classes (in a non ‘college liberal’ way), that can be labor claim integrated , improving public services like access to education, water, food production, energy, transport etc promote preservation for the future

We must bet on the economy to be back at the service of the people , natural resources, way of life and no the other way around

The territorial component has to be quintessential and strike a balance in the rural and urban sphere that passes through an improved balance of our existing distribution of power, through necessary transition towards transformational models and different distributed resources, reconciling the preservating natural heritage of the rural environment with improving the living conditions of our population, with a focused leading role which goes beyond the subaltern thinking of simple pantry or resource source for large cities, while valuing the legacy, experience and knowledge of our lands and their interconnected plural reality.

Enviromental Racism is a myth. There is no such thing as enviormental racism.

I believe in climate change, but I don't believe that Colonial, racist or patriarchal systems created or fueled it. Climate Change is not a manner of human rights. I am against Greta Thunberg's radical views on Climate Change. 

Climate Change will never cause temperatures to rise beyond 5.4F.  I don't believe that the Tail End risks of Climate Change will ever happen.    

Climate Change Apocalypse predictions may really be pointing to the Biblical Apocalypse (ie using the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse imagery). 

I pragmatically don't believe that the Climate Change Apocalypse type of climate change will happen.

I reject Deep Adaption and Jem Bernall's Deep Adaption. Deep Adaption climate predictions and Jem Bernall's climate predictions are way too Exaggerative.

I don't condemn Piers Corbyn for his views on Climate Change. He is very likely wrong, but if he doesn't want to believe in Climate Change, I say let him not believe it, no skin of my teeth. Corbyn's Climate Change skepticism will be proven wrong officially in the not so distant future when Climate Change's full effects are fully happening for all to see, too bad he won't be alive to see he was wrong on Climate Change. Since he is a weather person, I put a little more stock into his Climate Change views than the other skeptics 

Liberals are hypocrites on Climate Change and there is nothing wrong with pointing that out. I have a recommendation for energy conservation - Let's keep the Liberals' private jets on the ground

I have some sixth political position views about climate change that don't fit into any sort of political ideology on Climate Change checkbox (due to those views being unique and outside the box). 

I also have a few Post Conservative views on Climate Change which matches some of journalist Matthew Sheffield’s views of US Climate Change to the tee

I am against plastic bag bans, paper straw bans. I am against the Nord Steam pipeline being built. 

I support the Keystone Pipeline being built

I support the US developing its own energy sources so we don't have to rely on foreign energy anymore

I support increased logging on federal lands

I support Nuclear Energy and Wind Energy

Space

I support sending humans into space which is why I hope NASA brings the Space Shuttle program back. I hope one day space travel becomes as common as airline travel.

Biology/Chemistry/Physics

I believe that Intelligent Design is real for Earth, life on Earth, all other  planets in our universe and all life on planets in our universe. I also believe that Progressive Creationism is real in some other universes (and all life in said universes) which have different laws of nature

I am third political position to lean neutral on Joe Scarborough's 2005 Thiomersal view.

I am pitifully cautiously somewhat supportive of Dr Oz's reaction to his wife not allowing their kids to be vaxxed years ago

I am apolitical on pandemic politics but I do have a few left right views on it as noted below:

Sara Haines is wrong. Face coverings will NOT and should NOT be a permanat thing in the US or anywhere. When there are no viruses going around, people shouldn't wear face coverings and anyone who thinks otherwise is a paranoid nut who needs mental help. However, I would not complain if pandemic like restrictive laws to our society happened permanently after the pandemic (as long as those restrictive laws have nothing to do with pandemics or health) 

Since early Februrary 2022 I believe that Nancy Pelosi's face covering mandate for the House of Reps should be stopped and no one in the house of reps should be requried to cover their faces

I support Mike Braun's amendment to the Prevent Pandemics Act. 

I am between being more than pitifully,  cautiously somewhat supportive of Dr Oz's views on the pandemic

I do appreciate Ron Johnson's pandemic hearing early in the year on the pandemic to give another point of view.

I am between extremely pitiful and being empathetic with Ben Shapiro and Andrea Lynn's non extreme offensive views on the pandemic politics

In a hypothetical universe where teleportation existed and where most people had teleport machines, in that hypothetical world, I believe that most people from the US, Canada, Oceania, Australia, Europe, Asia, Africa, South America etc should have teleported to countries on other planets in other galaxies that have intelligent life beings on them in 2020 and 2021. I also believe in that hypothetical universe that when those people from our planet got to those other planets in other galaxies, they should not have social distanced ever, they should not have covered their face ever, they should not have told people on those other planets in other galaxies anything about our pandemic ever, and they should not have isolated themselves ever  (but if they went back to Earth they should have followed our pandemic restrictions and pandemic laws to the tee).   I am talking hypothetically. No countries on other planets in other galaxies would have pandemic laws or pandemic restrictions since all aliens on other planets would be immune to covid (since aliens on other planets aren't humans and have different biology than humans)

I am support the the Canadian trucker protest but even if I didn’t I still would be against Justin Trudeau using the emergency act on protestors. Even if I didn’t support the truckers, I still would be against his government going after bank accounts of protestors and supporters and similar underhanded things. However, I don't believe he is a dictator, but his actions do make me believe he is almot in the realm of being Authoartarian.Justin Trudeau was wrong to smear the Canadian freedom convoy protestors as bigots  

VLADIMIR PUTIN DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CANADIAN TRUCKER PROTEST AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS misguided

I believe in Reincarnation. I don't believe if evil people from evil empires (like the Babylon Empire)  were reincarnated ,they should be hated for the evil that they did in their past lives as part of those evil empires. I seriously pity people who believe that such reincarnated people should be judged and hated in this life for the evil they did in their past lives. I always say the best way to deal with such reincarnated people who did evil in their past lives is to give them WP:ROPE while also killing them with kindness.

There is an afterlife after people die and most scientists agree or say they don't know

Psychology

Psycho Analysis is a real science and anyone who says otherwise is a fake scientist.

etc

I support advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). I support sequencing and mapping of the human genome. I support these things as a way to eliminate disease, make humans live longer, have humans become more intelligent and better adjustment to the conditions of society