Women's issues and Men's Issues

Womens reproduction issues

I am generally opposed to abortion and I prefer if women and trans men have less access to abortion but I would never push for them to have less access to abortion

I am personally pro life for first trimester abortion. My personal and legal (nearly all of the time) abortion views are for personal reasons only, my mom almost lost me when she was pregnant with me. However, my personal and legal opinion on this issue differ.  I also cite Unplanned in helping me cement this position. 

Legality wise, I am Liberal-Conservative Populist for first trimester abortion and legality wise my views ob first trimester abortion matches Forza Italia 2013’s views on first trimester abortion (though every once in a  blue moon I do temporarily oscillate to lean Pro Choice/PLIABAN-pro life in all but a name for first trimester abortion but after doing so I always oscillate back to being Liberal-Conservative Populist (Forza Italia 2013 variant) on first trimester abortion soon again soon after).

Legality wise, I am Post Conservative on early term abortion which matches journalist Matthew Sheffield’s views on early term abortion to a tee 

Personally, I am pro life for second and third trimester abortion (except for rape and incest see below). 

Legality wise, I am pragmatically pro life on second trimester abortion (except for rape and incest), except when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN state, in which case, I am half heartingly pro choice for the second trimester abortion

Legality wise I am pro life for the third trimester abortion even when I oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN state

Personally ,I am neutral to lean pro choice for women who are pregnant via rape or incest. I am personally apolitical on abortion to save the life of the mother. 

Legality wise, I am pro choice for women who are pregnant via rape or incest (assuming that they were really raped or that their babies are really incenstious) , even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PBIABAN views

Personally, I am lean moral tolerance for (moral as moral victory) late term abortion for babies conceived via rape and incest. 

Legality wise, I am Christian Democraticly pretty much pro choice for late term abortion for babies conceived via rape and incest (though when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIABAN views, I am legality wise pro choice on late term abortion for babies conceived via rape and incest)

However if a baby who is conceived via rape or incest survives an abortion, 100 percent of the time I'd want that baby to get full medical care like any baby would and if they were denied medical care, I'd want the doctor and or nurse to be fired and charged with medical negligence.

I want partial birth abortion and live birth abortion to be illegal even for babies conceived via rape and incest (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

Whenever I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views, at those times I want abortion to be as restriction free for adult women as it is restriction free for adult women in Sweden, Canada and California.  I guess there are many instances when abortion really is the best way

Whenever I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views, at those times I believe one of the ways I want abortion to stay legal while heavily reducing the amount of abortions without using the government to directly do it would be to use the Compassionate Conservative approach of having the government indirectly get private companies, charities and religious organizations to give lucrative incentives for pregnant women who consider having abortions to have careful consideration and consultation with properly trained and oriented people like their families, physicians and clergy on their decision while then giving the women more incentives if they then agree to hear stories of abortion survivors, before deferring to the women and their doctors in a way that where we know they covered their bases.

Planned Parenthood's Mary Calderone once wrote that according to evidence from Scandinavians, when a woman seeks an abortion and she's given a chance of talking over her issues with properly trained and oriented people, that the woman will very often resolve a lot of her qualms and then spontaneously decide to go through with the pregnancy, especially if she has supportive help that will continue to be available to her

This isn't because we think women can't make the best decision. If men could also become pregnant and have babies, I'd use the above proposal for them too.  

Whenever I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views, at those times, I always state that another way I want abortion to stay legal while heavily reducing the amount of abortions without using the government to directly do it would be to use the Compassionate Conservative approach of having the government indirectly get private health companies, charities and religious organizations to heavily influence pregnant woman who show signs of wanting an abortion to consider planned c-sections as an alternative to having an abortion. Furthermore under this c section policy, I'd want the government to open more adoption centers throughout the country especially near abortion clinics along with having the government make it so its easy for women to give up their newborn babies for adoption and for those newborn babies to find a new home fast. Plus with this policy , I'd want women to have incentives for giving up their newborn babies for adoption. This would provide alternatives to abortion.

Whenever I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views, at those times i always feel that under both of the above two Pro Life in All But a Name Policies, I'd want the government (in a compassionate conservative way) to indirectly make it much easier for family members of women who had an abortion for any reason other than rape or incest to sue those women who had those abortions (after they had their abortion) in civil court (so the families of the women who had an abortion could have financial compensation for those women having their abortion). I'd also want the government to (in a compassionate conservative way) to indirectly and legally make it easier for those family members to win their civil suits against those women who had abortions.

As mentioned above, if men could also become pregnant and have babies, I'd use the above proposal for them too.

I support parental consent laws (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views) requiring minors under 17 to get permission for an abortion from their parents (except in cases of rape, incest , to save the life of the minor or some extremely rare cases)   

I support parental notification for a minor getting an abortion (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I support the Hyde Amendment (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I am militantly moderate on Texas's new abortion laws but I can’t deny the positive emotions I have about said laws. However I sympathize with people who are against those laws (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views). The most important thing we need in this is to continue to support women’s health. That is something we can all agree on

I am against Justin Trudeau going after pro life charities and pro life groups. Trudeau is a fascist dictator for doing that and proves he is a hypocrite on abortion since he doesn't trust women to make their own decision (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I believe that it should be illegal for employers to require their workers to be pro choice (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I believe it should be illegal for pregnant women  who are pregnant with a baby who has down syndrome to abort their babies because those babies have Down Syndrome. (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

Ronald Reagan once said "the only people who are pro choice are people who are alive"   

I take a Bull Moose Progressive stance on Roe v Wade being overturned

I never donate to any pro choice company and I never have and I never will encourage women to have abortions, if they ask me if they should keep the baby I always tell them to keep the baby. I never campaign for or vote for any pro choice political candidate unless in most situations.  (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I encourage everyone to aggressively pray for women to keep their children, even if they conceived that child through rape or incest (if that is best for God and the woman).   (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I am Militantly Moderate on surrogate motherhood with the same view on that issue as the book Mediations of a Militant Moderate https://books.google.com/books?id=VMZHuyK5NTsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false

I want children aged 11–12 to get proper sex education before they graduate elementary school and then continue sex education into their teens so that children and teens know how not to get pregnant, if they use common sense, and have more access anticonceptives which should be made available to them with some common sense restrictions.  I'd want children and teens to be taught sex education methods approve of by Christian groups and family groups only.  (even when I am pragmatically pro life)

In addition, along with sex education, I always want teach kids and teens to learn abstinence. I am pro abstinence. (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I always feel that health care providers should not be required to offer free birth control. (even when I temporarily oscillate to my lean pro choice/PLIAN-Pro Life in all but a name views)

I always am indifferent to birth control being legal

I am apolitical on Stem Cell research

I am against population control. Population Control is an assault on reproductive rights and its a human rights violation (right to procreate, right to life) . Human life is sacred. Overpopulation (the other excuse for it) is a myth. Climate change is real but population control doesn't stop it and is extremely counterproductive. 

feminism

I am a forth wave feminist in a way that Rush Limbaugh could be seen as being feminist if people took his words out of context or pieced together that makes Limbaugh sound like a forth wave feminist

The US can no longer be understood without its feminism. We should place a special emphasis on constructing feminist discourse and action to play a big role in our political parties.  We need to link with different leftist feminist movements 

I support autonomous feminist strikes to advance equality between women and men. I support overthrowing the male/female order of things in the US and an alternative future with a greater presence of a feminist agenda and inevitably with a greater presence of women in all areas of our society (once we overthrow the the male/female order of things)

I support fourth wave feminist things to ensure this including ending sexist/sexual violence, fixing the care system by committing to a feminist economy.

I support the diversity of families, motherhood, the right to conciliation also from feminism or the need to point out how all of the essential care and social reproduction work fell invisibly on the shoulders of women. Feminism defending BIPOC and Transgender people is unavoidable and we need feminism to take an unequivocal path towards the power dispute

Feminism should be the main agenda in politics due to the majorities our political parties represent. We have to view our political future with purple glasses on

We need to promote the historical claim of all women of their full rights and at the same time, undertake the necessary construction of the society of the future. This is essential to incorporate men, since it also guarantees rights to them, with the belief that feminism and democracy, feminism and freedom, feminism and justice are always synonymous with each other. We need to end the disputes by the right of feminist democracy

We need to deepen the mainstreaming of feminism in the structure if our organizations, especially our political organizations. We need diplomatic and militantly moderate dialogue and practices to confront (in a Christian way) on the streets and in the institutions those who have made the rights of women, migrant ,BIPOC people and LGTBQ people in the community their enemy. We must also do this by paying special attention to the consequences that this above context has on the people within our political organizations who, as part of these above groups, fight on the front lines of politics

We need to recognize the task of feminism of our political organizations in constructing state leadership that defines challenges of the future

We need to put life at the center as to fight against all forms of sexist violence that women suffer. This is to articulate a response to the reactionary violence that is unleashed in the face of the struggle for justice, and it’s to defend the needed redistribution of wealth and to ensure along the way, that no one is left behind or denied their rights. Putting life at the center tells us about a feminism for the social majorities

We should support a feminism that has memory located from bodies , from the class, from desire, from borders etc We should support feminism that aspires to build itself up from margins but which also fundamentally that aspires to build the future of our country (the US) with clear constituent and constitutional vocation

But there are a lot of feminist things (especially forth and fifth wave things) that I am against  (like that Lego complaint years ago by feminists, or the view by feminists that all men are rapists, or feminists saying that that video game designer from Puerto Rico was misogynist or should be fired for his gamer gate comments, or feminist complaints that Jurassic World was a sexist movie, or downplaying Valerie Solanas's extremism, or complaints about how women are portrayed in most video games, or feminist complaints about urinals, those type of feminist views like that and some other views I loathe and strongly disagree with).

Off the record, Feminism is my main focus in politics 

Women should always get paid equally to men. I support income equality

I support the VAWRA Act of 2012. to include actual or perceived sex/gender and to include an an amendment to include stronger punishments for female on male violence

I support woman's suffrage

I am against some aspects of the Equal Rights Amendment.  I don't believe there should be an equal amount of men and women players in the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, . I don't believe that Women's Shelters should be shut down or be shelters for all genders or similar things in the ERA.

I am against Prostitution being legal or decriminalized but the buyer should go to prison not the sex worker. 

We should be allies of the feminist movement because our mothers are (or were if they died) women and they gave birth to us and many of our spouses are women.

I do not agree with things in the Wikipedia article about Gender Bias on Wikipedia. There is no one stopping women from becoming Wikipedia editors and writing articles about women or other subjects. It is just as easy for women to jump in and become regular Wikipedia editors as it is for men to do so. If any editor editor, male or female can't do that, it means they shouldn't edit Wikipedia, not because of their gender but because they are too weak.

If women can't pass the military training tests to be on the front lines they shouldn't be on the front lines. Lowering the standards for our military is wrong. War is life and death and PC policies have no place in war. But men who can’t get the job done and use their intution  (like women can), shouldn’t be in the military either. So I guess in this world, there would barely be any military.

That Slate reporter years ago was correct to share tips about Wikipedia controversies with another reporter and by mentioning the relationship status of that video game designer Anita S.

Men's issues

The documentary Red Pill makes more than some good points and at worst I am pretty sympathetic towards it.

I support Josh Hawley's Men and the Future of America Speech. I do feel however his speech was cult like and could have been done in a way that wouldn't make me feel like that. 

I don't find Chris Pratt's Instagram post sexist in any way shape or form. People who find it sexist need mental health.

I believe there is nothing wrong with men showing chivalry to women and I know that chivalry is not sexist

In general, there is nothing wrong with Masculinity.   Toxic Masculinity doesn't exist and is just a fake term created by far leftists.  If Toxic Masculinity does exist, I am Liberal-Conservative Populist

Male Chauvinism is wrong because men should respect toward women and Male Chauvinism is against that principal. Right Wingers are supposed to be chivalrous toward women and Male Chauvinism goes against the Right Wing value of chivalry 

I have a somewhere between an Anti Villain and  Anti Hero (but closer to Anti Hero) admiration for NO MA'AM from Married with Children . Though I prefer Al's friend Steve's views on those things

I oscillate between negative second political position and neutral not believe on whether I believe that male privilege is real.  I have never and I will never apologize for being male. There is nothing wrong with being male.

Relational issues

I believe we should heavily encourage and maybe even give lucrative incentives to more Christians to adopt children 

I believe that adopting children should be easier for people

Domestic violence is evil and wrong. Conservative and Christian men are supposed to love and protect their wives not hurt them. Conservative and Christian men are supposed to be gentlemen to their wives not abusers. Domestic abusers need to be stopped

There is nothing wrong with Sandy from Grease changing herself into a biker chic to please Danny. There is nothing wrong with girls changing something about themselves in order to please a guy just like there is nothing wrong with guys changing something about themselves to please a girl.

I support the Promise Keepers. Some of my friends from old church were members of Promise Keepers.  

I believe that a husband has a responsibility to lead his household in a loving and gentle way, giving his life to his wife (like how Christ gave his life to the Church by dying) so she (the wife) can willingly submit to her husband's leadership. 

I support stimulation of birth rate and support for young families to endure stability for the decision of motherhood. I want preferential mortgage conditions for home purchasing , public financing of the costs of small children, providing sufficient childcare facilities etc

Similar to the Apostle Paul, I believe that for singles it is good for them to remain single unless they cannot self control in which case they should get into a romantic relationship (its better to get into a romantic relationship than to burn with lust) I believe this because single people have more time and freedom to help make our world more progressive, and due to me believing that romantic relationships are more a forced social construct, even more so than marriages and I hate forced social constructs.   

In light of that, I would strongly empathize with the idea of the government creating a romantic relationship tax which somewhat taxes Americans (of all sexual orientations) who are in a romantic relationship. However, once they get married or they became single again, that tax would be eliminated unless they get into another romantic relationship again.  Unlike Paul, I believe that marriages give people a lot more freedom today to make the world a better place than it was during Paul's time, almost as much freedom as singles in Paul's day had for themselves.   If this tax had the negative side effect of causing less births (which I don't want since I am against Population control), then I would be against this tax unless I found some way to have this tax be legal while at the same time not causing less births.