Immigration (legal and illegal)

Immigration /Illegal Immigration

I am militantly moderate on migration/illegal immigration. My views on migration and illegal immigration match views on those issues from the book Mediation of a Militant Moderate https://books.google.com/books?id=VMZHuyK5NTsC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA164#v=onepage&q&f=false  and some abstract views on those issues of other militant moderates (like Ross Perot)

We need to prioritize the concept of citizenship by putting the fact of residence first while also separating access to political rights from the degree of national identification. 

Giving primacy to citizenship over nationality implies giving priority to our political society, and this entails a less organic conception of that community, and more open. The political participation and representation of immigrants are important for the social transformation of our country, working for the right to active and passive voting. A country that strengthens its democracy without anyone being left out is an ideal country. Force by marginalized groups is a good way to do that. Defensive Democracy with an eye on national memory can also accomplish this

Inequality does not affect us all equally , discrimination has its roots in Keynesian/Crony Capitalist, Neoliberal , patriarchal domination and a perspective on how to fight against this domination eithin our political parties in a natural, tasteful way weakens us as a whole and our democracy

We have to regularize migrants and develop measures that we have been defending in recent years; reestablishing legal and safe pathways; relaxing some of the criteria for settlement, and the criteria for residence and work permits; guaranteeing access to the procedure for asylum seekers along with processing files in a timely manner that is without delay; guaranteeing the rights of migrant children  while always respecting the best interests of the minor, among other issues.

We also must commit to developing public migration policies which move towards a different horizon of migration governance where the rights of all people are respected. It is necessary to continue working to expand rights within the current regulatory migration framework

I am ok with promoting a real and effective Common Asylum System which puts an end to the lack of homogeneity in the international protection of refugees in various countries. The US must be the border to Canada, Central and South America and the Europe. This must be done in a fair and humanitarian way in terms of migration, that respects the migration rights and the right to life. with an eye for voluntary and self returns

I am not against Amnesty for up to 10,000 or up to a million or so if I felt that the situation warranted and the progressives were able to sell me on it, but I wouldn't be crazy about that either. 

I'm against Sanctuary cities. 

I criticize the way immigration has been handled by the liberals 

I am open minded to the idea of having the United States ,Mexico and Central America form a supranational nation  (similar to the European Union) which would by default make the vast majority of illegals who are currently living in the US 'legal' and treat migration between the US and those countries as migration between EU countries is treated. I'd also want every few years for there to be a mandatory Brexit type vote for the US, Mexico and those Central American countries in said supernational union to decide if they want to stay or pull out of this suprnational union, similar to Britain's Brexit vote years back. 

I between condone (without any empathy) and somewhat empathize with the US creating a deportation system for xenophobic Americans that fuses methods in this article: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/06/home-office-secret-plan-charities-deport-rough-sleepers (but for xenophobic Americans only);with a plan that gently expulses xenophobic Americans , using ICE (who now would be called Xenobobic Control Enforcement), the Dep of Defense and the army peace core to jointly establish a secret unit charged with "encouraging" for the departure of xenophobic Americans for Canada, Europe, Australia, South America, Argentina etc. 

They would give assistance to these xenophobic Americans who 'wished' to emigrate from here with an organization which would deal with it. This way we non xenophobes won’t have to be upset about mass migration and illegal immigration since the xenophobes we exile won’t be living in the US anymore to force us to be upset about those things

I feel the two different systems in the above two paragraphs would be so over the top, it would force both sides to come together to find a practical and humane REAL solution to the illegal immigration and mass migration issues (as opposed to politicans on both sides never getting such things done on this issue since politicians are all talk and no action on hot button issues) sort of like in a 12 Angry men (Henry Ford version) sort of way

The US must work in Central America to address the root causes of migration from Central America, to recognize that we don't need to sacrifice our humanity in the name of security. We also must work with Mexico to make sure that it takes its own border security seriously. Moreover, working with our neighbors to improve security across the region is an imporant component of any policy to promote prosperity and fairness in the hemisphere. A safe and secure region will lead to a safer, more secure United States.  

I also believe that the US also must engage with countries like Mexico and in Central America to address the causes that cause them to migrate to the US illegally (ie to curb illegal immigration to the US from those countries)

I don't believe that churches should snitch on illegal immigrants because that would be against God

Remember Jesus quote in the bible about David stealing the bread? I feel that is needed to provide nuance to the illegal immigration debate.

I am pro migration, but if we ever get to a point where there are 20 million or more (give or take 5 million or 10 million) migrants moving into the US a year, at that point I would support closing the border or severely and extremely restricting migration for years. Everything has a limit, including migration.

I am against Joe Biden flying in illegal aliens into our country. That is wrong on so many levels

Illegal immigrants and refugees in the US don't commit more or less crimes/violent crimes than legal US citizens

We need to actively recruit non center left/non left center migrants moving into the US to become militantly moderate or Post Conservative and embrace left wing republicanism (which would mean less migrants would become Democrats) in exchange for us helping those migrants connect and integrate  themselves with our community and feel accepted. 

This is what used to happen in New Mexico for migrants (but it was vote Democrat not Republican then and there). A lot of migrants come from countries that aren't as anti Democrat as the US

The Democrats have been using migrants to usurp control from us non Democrats over the decades so we need to counter that with this method. Democrats are smart for doing that and we are behind the eight ball on that. See here for more https://cis.org/Report/Immigration-and-Usurpation

Migrants to the US should learn English

Ronald Reagan said it best when he said you can move to Japan but not become Japanese, you can move to France but not become a Frenchman/Frenchwoman but you can move to America and become an American. Optimism is better than Determism. I believe that the US is a melting pot

I believe the number of refugees to be accepted needs to be determined through negotiations

Undocumented migrants shouldn't have more rights than legal citizens

I am against illegal immigrants getting free health care

I am against NAFTA

I support Brexit

I am a Eurosceptic (in some ways like Podemos) but I have a Pro European streak in me

I support Australia like Jus soli