Posts

Showing posts from January, 2023

Anti consumerism matslm

gays self haring phobes racists if turned would be most likely to support groups they hate matt taibbi democracy defense fr etc ggreenwald ed edd eddy eddie sweat tea non offnesif all progs radlibs go right mainstewam dems to, so top stop stop purity/eating own expose non purity of purity test lib 2.0ers stll no freedom not due to vrsus bail out no go silicon valley intmnt d by bipoc due to recesm chrges run views by kevinc rson consumerism mental disorder /idpol  =bigoted thoughts me 2010s 2020s stupidpol articulaes thisincluding consumerism=cpaitlissm consuermism twitter nick fuentes good guy nnow once you see little bad in dems you see more and more spoioled btch something mssng dem v rep thing xtian? rep8blicans left are right but cant prove it they sux 4pt, post liberal  dark mutualism , nck fntes thing reactionary by using left far left ie queer theory, transgender anarchism , anarcha to move us so left that we will achieve a more left version of 4pt , post liberal but i...

big tec cesndo done done done

I am against techno authoritarianism I am a fan of online trolling using Marxist-Leninist-Veronism unity ways and done right and in between in good taste and in tongue and cheek (ymmv) "To this very day, Big Tech censorship never silences those who spout establishment pieties or who serve (Liberal. 2.0) establishment interests. The targets of censorship - as has always been true - are those who express fringe, marginalized and unpopular-among-the-powerful dissent (i.e on the left wing, right wing and even to an extreme much lesser extent Liberal 2.0)." Glenn Greenwald There is major big tech censorship and we must end big tech censorship ,see  here  and  here  for more. Also see this for some way to end it Big Tech censorship is real . Non Liberal 2.0ers are being censored, and deplatformed on Big Tech due to their views and we need to stop that censorship. See this ,  this ,  this ,  this ,  this ,  this ,  this  , this for more....

bias ififiixix done done done

There are two sides to every story and most political issues , read  this If we value diversity, we should value dive rsity of view points (assuming those viewpoints are not bigoted). If we only hear viewpoints of the people who think like us or who we agree with, that is not a healthy thing and is a close minded, ignorant thing to do. People have a right to be wrong No philosophy or ideology on Earth is the  final arbiter of truth  (within reason). We allow a matrix (i.e intellectual class) of elites and experts to decide what cultural issues we should support and not support. Who are they to decide what is moral and what is immoral or what views are acceptable or non acceptable. They are humans not Gods The MSM , NGOs etc divide us ,target , smear and cancel anyone who doesn’t conform to their Liberal 2.0 rhetoric. The MSM along with the SPLC and ADL in particular enflame and fan the flames of hate through such vile, borderline corrupt tactics You have give to ...

ideoglgog ttren done done

I am wary to cautiously ok with Reunited States of America film and its points . But I also second some  critiques that Jacobin had  of that film. While political divisiveness is certainly a huge issue in the US, it is poverty and exploitation that are the biggest problems in the US and are bigger issues than political divisiveness  I like how the film talks about the need for conversations, wants to go beyond partisanship and rancor, tries to create a system of solutions, to be problem solvers, not a partisans I like how the film wants to shatter the political binary. There is multiple valid ways to solve math problems according to Equitable Math so there is similarly multiple valid views on and solutions to political issues also It is topical in broad stokes but frustratingly allergic to particulars . It is earnest and well meaning It rightfully makes a decent case for political empathy. But political empathy and a willingness to hear alternative viewpoints, as it turns...

Taboo tabviews notes

 I am against Polygamy, Polyarmy and open marriages being legal in our current society but I want us to abolish the family unit as the norm or completely since as a Marxian Leftist, I support the bigger picture of our society being a collective, decentralized free society which includes polygamy, polyarmy etc being the norm etc. So I want us to become a Marxist Leftist society first then make polygamy, polyarmy and open marriages legal and as normal as the family unit. But NOT before that.    (supporting polygamy etc is as bad to Republicans in mid 19th century as supporting bondage) Monogamy is better than those systems as shown by science. Children suffer when they have parents who are Polygamous, Polyarmous or in open marriages. Polygamy et al cheapens love. If people in marriages want more they should get a divorce first. Sadly, a significant amount of gay, straight curious and bi people don’t find the concept of monogamy enjoyable.  Richard Spncer alt right ...

Misc misc expltain takes

Life I am against hotels and motels having televisions in the hotel room bathrooms/motel room bathrooms too. That is wrong, unneeded, extremist consumerism , evil, disgusting and basically soma to hide corporate greed. People do not need to watch TV when they go bathroom in their hotel rooms/motel rooms. If people are so obsessed with tv they need to watch it in the bathroom of their hotel/motel rooms, maybe they need to go into rehab for this sick, twisted disgusting consumerist addiction to the IDIOT Box.  There really shouldn't be TVs in public bathrooms of public places either . I am against hospitals giving patients their own personal TVs in their curtained off rolling surgery waiting area beds. At most there should be one normal tv in the waiting area for surgery for everyone and even then it is unneeded Society was without tv for millenias and nowadays these moron idiot freaks have to have tvs in bathrooms and their own personal tvs in hospital waiting surgery areas ? NO NO ...